Официальная обратная связь диалогов

This report seeks to summarise views and perspectives of webinar participants during discussions, and does not necessarily represent the views of the CSIRO or the Australian Government. We need to transform our food systems the same way we are transforming our energy systems. We need nationally coordinated governance and research mechanism(s) that can bring together the multiple objectives of food systems (human and planetary health, equity, economic prosperity) to underpin multisector collaboration and cooperation. Acknowleding our current market-led approach to governing our food system, we ... Подробнееmust ensure all people in our food system - small farmers, small and medium sized food businesses, Indigenous peoples, civil society groups, consumers, experts, future generations, have their voices heard. We need a representative national food governance body that can coordinate research and policy and develop a national food system strategy that can level the playing field between public good interests (health, livelihoods, environment) with the private interests. That will require some major innovation in how we govern our food system, including for example, the establishment of a representative national food governance body and food policy processes that give everyone a voice. This could encompass: • establish a taskforce to look at where the gaps are to bring efforts together; • establish a national level Ministry for Food with a role to develop a comprehensive and unified national food and nutrition plan that provides a framework recognising the multiple objectives of food systems and ensures all food related activities are underpinned by the same goals and reduces the likelihood of policies and activities undermining each other; • maintain a collective action mechanism of sustainable food systems interests to create / maintain pressure and visibility. An atomised approach by individuals will not work. Let these dialogues be the start of this transformational movement. Скрыть

This report seeks to summarise views and perspectives of webinar participants during discussions, and does not necessarily represent the views of the CSIRO or the Australian Government. We need to improve communication and reframe the narrative around food and our food systems so it has urgency but also removes the divisive messaging between city and rural communities and provides a sense of hope that we can deliver the solutions needed for improved food systems that deliver the triple challenges. Currently our public discourse is often polluted by fear and ideology (for example, fossil fuels ... Подробнееversus clean energy). We need a more coordinated and sophisticated approach to engagement and communication to advance sustainable and healthy diets and food production – that does not demonise some or polarise the debate, for example around plant and meat proteins. These are false dichotomies. We need memes to express the complexity of the food system. This would require substantial commitment from governmental communication agencies. Скрыть

This report seeks to summarise views and perspectives of webinar participants during discussions, and does not necessarily represent the views of the CSIRO or the Australian Government. We recognise the need to promote transparency, accountability and a level playing field for all actors in food systems. But there is currently a lack of political will at all levels to implement or invest in evidence-based actions and commercial interests drive decisions across the whole food system. We need to create mechanisms to achieve a level playing field where all voices have a seat at the table (modelle... Подробнееd on the aims of the United Nations Food System Summit) including people and agencies representing public good interests of health, nutrition, livelihoods and environment, who currently have limited access to policy makers, decision makers and politicians. Policy and regulation are required to change the food environment so that consumers are supported to make healthy food choices. The current food environment encourages the consumption of discretionary foods in many ways including the convenience, pervasive availability, marketing and cheap cost of unhealthy food. Policy approaches for which there is strong public health evidence include reformulation, front of pack labelling, controlling the support and marketing of ultra-processed food particularly to children, product placement and fast food consumption (e.g., connected with sports), and fiscal policy such as a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages. All fiscal policies must ensure that they do not increase inequities (e.g., ensuring no disproportional impacts to low income households). Treasury needs to be involved, for example. Improving food literacy can assist with making healthier choices. We need to resolve certain structural problems that make it difficult for consumers to realise healthier diets. Lack of food knowledge and upskilling is needed across all of society. Not everyone knows how to prepare healthy food and this needs to be resolved such that it is no longer a barrier to healthy food consumption. Addressing this through early childhood education can be an effective mechanism for change. Скрыть

This report seeks to summarise views and perspectives of webinar participants and does not necessarily represent the views of the Australian Government. In addition to the topics already highlighted – there were a number of additional high-level key messages emerging during the dialogue discussion, including: • Given the diversity of agricultural business models and within the Australian natural environment, there is no one-size-fits-all approach to addressing challenges in Australian food systems, including those related to environmental sustainability. It was acknowledged that solutions ... Подробнееshould be appropriate for the local context and science-based. • There is a need for farmers and producers to be provided with accurate and adequate data, information and technology to enable them to make informed decisions appropriate to their business and context. This can be complemented with a range of appropriate agri-environmental policy measures, including information services and extension, regulations, grant-based schemes and environmental markets. • Australian producers and other stakeholders employ and are developing a wide range of policies, programs and initiatives to support and incentivise sustainable agriculture production, build biodiversity and improve climate resilience. This includes individual farmers and agricultural industries (including Beef and Dairy sectors) which promote uptake of practices to deliver positive environmental impacts and are working towards carbon neutrality. • There is a need to ensure that innovations, solutions, and research are designed with the needs of end-users (i.e. farmers/producers and other stakeholders) in mind and that successful practices and implementations can be effectively and appropriately communicated to farmers/producers. A focus on collaboration across scales and levels (local, national, regional and global) will be important. • It is important to emphasise and better communicate the “co-benefits” of sustainable farming practices to promote wider update and adoption. For example, measuring soil carbon can be used for carbon trading and offer potential additional revenue streams, but can also deliver improved biodiversity, greater water retention, greater nutrient recycling and greater nitrogen mineralisation. • Environmental markets and payments for ecosystem services are an emerging feature of Australia’s environmental and agricultural policy landscape. They may offer an effective mechanism to promote improved conservation, biodiversity and sustainability outcomes and should be considered in conjunction with improved information, regulation, and grants-based mechanisms. • There is significant value for producers and consumers in comprehensive and clear industry sustainability frameworks and targets. • There may be opportunities for the agricultural sector to contribute towards environmental sustainability outcomes through renewable energy generation, including by integrating wind and solar on grazing lands. Скрыть

This report seeks to summarise views and perspectives of webinar participants and does not necessarily represent the views of the Australian Government. In addition to the key messages already detailed there were a number of issues discussed which may have signified a divergence of views, including: • Consideration as to how externalities associated with food production (i.e. social and environmental) can be more accurately reflected in food pricing and via existing market mechanisms. It was suggested that “cheap food” may not be “better food” and that consumers can be empowered to f... Подробнееactor factors beyond price (such as sustainable agriculture production) into their consumption decision-making. • Exploration of animal-sourced and plant-sourced foods, particularly as it relates to the environmental impact of the livestock sector, dietary choices and the consumption of adequate protein for human nutrition. It was suggested that there is a need for a balanced, evidence-based and context-specific approach which recognises the complementarity of animal and plant production systems, opportunities for sustainable utilisation of rangelands and the role of animal and plant proteins in a balanced, nutritious diet. It was also highlighted that agricultural innovations and technologies will be important to further improve environmental sustainability (i.e. reducing methane in livestock) and helping to boost global food security. • Decision-makers need to carefully consider and assess policy options in order to optimise the return from scarce resources that can be allocated for conservation while ensuring equity and appropriate incentivisation. Initiatives or programmes seeking to promote uptake of innovative or sustainable practices should not inadvertently penalise farmers already “doing the right thing” (i.e. through additionality requirements). • Rather than focusing on sustainably intensifying food production as a means to meet global food needs, global food distribution networks and food loss and waste issues also need to be considered. • There may be high transaction costs for farmers to enter into and participate in environmental markets, and market complexity is currently a major barrier to their widespread uptake. There is a need to develop and use auditing/assessment procedures which provide integrity, but at a lower financial impost. Farmers will need to be provided with sufficient information to participate in these emerging markets, and there will be a need for adequate information and extension services. • Consideration of the role of consumer choice and supply chains in encouraging consumption that can reward farmers and producers for their sustainable practices. Producers and other stakeholders in the supply-chain already aim to adapt and respond to consumer expectations and demand – but this can be further strengthened. • There is a need for more systemic and holistic approaches to address issues such as land-clearing to ensure the appropriate balancing of social, economic and environmental considerations. This may include clarifying differences in between “regrowth” and “remnant” vegetation and ensuring that decisions are science-based, and achieve the desired natural resource management outcomes (i.e. biodiversity and habitat preservation, biosecurity pest concerns, soil degradation). Скрыть

As the first in the series of Australian National Food Systems Summit Dialogues hosted by the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, the major focus of this webinar Growing Greener – food production and a healthy environment was to explore: • how sustainable food and fibre production can help meet the challenges of biodiversity loss, climate change, and an increasing population; • the need to produce more food with less environmental and natural resource impact; • investigate innovations and technology for environmental sustainability, including the role of market-based ... Подробнееapproaches for valuing environmental services and natural resources. We were pleased to have the participation of the following panellists to lead discussion: • Fiona Simson, President, National Farmers Federation, Farmer and Board Director • Professor Richard Eckard, Professor of Sustainable Agriculture and Director of the Primary Industries Climate Challenges Centre, University of Melbourne • Professor Andrew McIntosh, Associate Dean (Research) at the ANU College of Law; environmental law and policy scholar, Australian National University • Melinee Leather, Owner/Manager, Leather Cattle Company Скрыть

This report seeks to summarise views and perspectives of webinar participants and does not necessarily represent the views of the Australian Government. Three expert panellists explored the webinar themes outlined previously by delivering short presentations to webinar participants. Key messages highlighted during these presentations included: • The important role of industry frameworks, metrics and roadmaps for delivering sustainable agricultural industry growth in Australia out to 2030 – at the industry, commodity and individual farmer level. • Australian farmers and other agricultural... Подробнее stakeholders are already employing practices and innovations to deliver good natural resource management and sustainability outcomes – including relating to emissions reduction and soils monitoring and management. • It can be important to consider the relationship between affordable and environmentally sustainable food production and the structure and role of global food distribution networks when thinking about how to give effect to Sustainable Development Goal 2 – Zero Hunger. • The importance of exploring and promoting “co-benefits” when incentivising more sustainable agricultural production practices (i.e soil carbon may offer benefits in terms of trading and market return, but also improves biodiversity and productivity). • There have been many elements to historical and contemporary agri-enviro policy in Australia – which has sought to incentivise sustainable agriculture practices and protect the natural resource base. This includes the use of information instruments and extension services, direct regulation and use of grant-based schemes. • While there is a continued need for all of these into the future, currently, there is an emerging focus on environmental markets and their potential for integrating conservation measures in a way that compliments agricultural production and provides new revenue streams for agricultural producers. This may include payment for ecosystem services such as carbon and biodiversity. A special-feature webinar panellist gave a short presentation on practices they employ within their cattle farming business to deliver environmental sustainability outcomes including: • innovative use of digital mapping technologies to measure land health; • crop rotations and vegetation management; • introduction of Leucaena and other legumes to increase water infiltration and and reduce GHG emissions; • diverse tree plantings and revegetation to encourage biodiversity; • carbon accounting systems; • use of solar energy; and undertaking other biosecurity activities. The question and answer session was wide-ranging reflecting strong stakeholder engagement and interest. Some key thematic elements of the discussion related to: • the characteristics of a healthy and environmentally sustainable diet; • state/federal government interactions and responsibilities in the agri-environmental sector; • transaction costs involved in measuring ecosystem services; • indigenous plant varieties and the role of traditional knowledges; • consumer behaviour and the role of supermarkets; • urban sprawl and the potential impact on agricultural land; • diversified cropping and farming models and biodiversity conservation; • innovations in fruit and vegetable production and incentivising their increased consumption; • incentivising the uptake of national market-based sustainability schemes; • land-clearing practices; • potential for renewable energy generation on agricultural land. Скрыть

This report seeks to summarise views and perspectives of webinar participants and does not necessarily represent the views of the Australian Government. In addition to the key messages already detailed there were a number of issues raised which may have signified a divergence of views, including: • Consideration as to how the “true cost of food” (i.e. environmental, economic and social externalities) can be reflected in pricing structures and production and consumption patterns. Similarly, there was discussion around how best to ensure that factors such as nutrition, food safety and qual... Подробнееity, sustainability outcomes can be systematically included as “measures of success” for our agri-food systems, beyond a the metric indicator of profit or economic return. • How to consider food systems challenges and issues in a more holistic manner (i.e. beyond the current predominant siloed approach) and foster policy harmonization between different sectors. There are different perspectives on how best to do this and whether there is a need for new institutions/approaches – but it may involve assessing the opportunity costs and trade-offs of food production in certain regions. • The perspective that the current structure of our food systems leads to increased rates of malnutrition and non-communicable diseases which is costly, both in terms of lost productivity but also direct costs borne by health systems. • Consideration as to how food systems stakeholders, including producers, can best continue to mitigate and adapt to climate change impacts. • The co-existence of plant and animal protein production in the Australian agricultural sector and exploration of opportunities for mutual development and innovation. • While there is a need to consider lower-level adaptations (i.e. incremental advances in production efficiency) there is also a need to simultaneously consider large-scale systematic and transformational adaptations which can change the “efficiency boundary” and the nature of system trade-offs (i.e. genetic technologies, supply chain modification). Скрыть

This report seeks to summarise views and perspectives of webinar participants and does not necessarily represent the views of the Australian Government. In addition to the topics already highlighted – there were a number of additional high-level key messages emerging during the dialogue discussion, including: • There is a continued need to foster the development of innovative approaches, solutions, and research outcomes that meets the needs of producers, consumers and other stakeholders along the supply chain, in order to boost resilience to future shocks and vulnerabilities facing food sy... Подробнееstems. • Approaches which emphasise the importance of collaboration will be critically important. Connected, integrated and agile food systems, which are underpinned by robust data and information networks, will be fundamental to resilient food systems, allowing stakeholders across food systems supply chains to make accurate and informed decisions to minimise the impact of future shocks and vulnerabilities. • The flow of information and market incentives from consumers to producers (and vice versa) is an important driver of food systems development and function. It will be important to improve connectivity in the value chain to ensure it is demand driven and reflects consumer wants and values, including relating to provenance. Ensuring the right products are grown in the right regions and facilitating the path to market is important for food security for all Australians. • Increased collaboration and relationship building between different levels of stakeholders in food systems also can bring about positive outcomes – including in the establishment of new “value-adding” industries which can strengthen the agri-food sector and its important contribution to the Australian economy. There are also many positive benefits and efficiencies to be found in further digitalisation and modernisation of the “logistics” of trading regulations and practices. • There is a need to incorporate “systems thinking” in our decision making for our food systems. There is a need to think beyond productivity metrics and consider multiple objectives and values. This will involve a need to consider indirect impacts and trade-offs of certain actions and policies. It will be necessary to promote collaborative approaches to achieve a joint and shared vision for our food systems and the transition pathways we may embark upon to get there. Скрыть

This report seeks to summarise views and perspectives of webinar participants and does not necessarily represent the views of the Australian Government. In addition to the key messages already detailed there were a number of issues raised which may have signified a divergence of views, including: • Consideration as to how the “true cost of food” (i.e. environmental, economic and social externalities) can be reflected in pricing structures and production and consumption patterns. Similarly, there was discussion around how best to ensure that factors such as nutrition, food safety and qual... Подробнееity, sustainability outcomes can be systematically included as “measures of success” for our agri-food systems, beyond a the metric indicator of profit or economic return. • How to consider food systems challenges and issues in a more holistic manner (i.e. beyond the current predominant siloed approach) and foster policy harmonization between different sectors. There are different perspectives on how best to do this and whether there is a need for new institutions/approaches – but it may involve assessing the opportunity costs and trade-offs of food production in certain regions. • The perspective that the current structure of our food systems leads to increased rates of malnutrition and non-communicable diseases which is costly, both in terms of lost productivity but also direct costs borne by health systems. • Consideration as to how food systems stakeholders, including producers, can best continue to mitigate and adapt to climate change impacts. • The co-existence of plant and animal protein production in the Australian agricultural sector and exploration of opportunities for mutual development and innovation. • While there is a need to consider lower-level adaptations (i.e. incremental advances in production efficiency) there is also a need to simultaneously consider large-scale systematic and transformational adaptations which can change the “efficiency boundary” and the nature of system trade-offs (i.e. genetic technologies, supply chain modification). Скрыть

As the second in the series of Australian National Food Systems Summit Dialogues hosted by the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, the major focus of this webinar Future proofing our food systems – boosting resilience was to explore: • the challenges and opportunities posed by future trends and risks, including climate change, potential trade and supply chain disruptions, and changing consumer patterns and demands • how stakeholders across the food supply chain are working to adapt and increase their resilience to potential vulnerabilities, shocks and stresses to safegu... Подробнееard a future food system that is sustainable and stable We were pleased to have the participation of the following panellists to lead discussion: • Peter Gooday, Assistant Secretary, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics • Professor Mario Herrero, Chief Research Scientist of Agriculture and Food, CSIRO • Professor Mark Howden, Director, Institute for Climate, Energy & Disaster Solutions, Australian National University • David Eyre, CEO, Future Food Systems Cooperative Research Centre • Doug McNicholl, Program Manager, Sustainability and Innovation, Meat and Livestock Australia • Brianna Casey, Chief Executive Officer, Foodbank Australia Скрыть

This report seeks to summarise views and perspectives of webinar participants and does not necessarily represent the views of the Australian Government. Four expert panellists explored the webinar themes outlined previously – delivering short presentations to webinar participants. Key messages highlighted during these presentations are provided below: • There are five key megatrends likely to influence Australian agriculture and food systems over the short, medium and long term which include: - the growth juggernaut in emerging Asian economies and greater demand for food and fibre and risi... Подробнееng expectations around health, provenance and sustainability from expanded middle class consumers; - fractal politics and a more contested international trading landscape; - the need to produce more from less by ensuring continued productivity growth; - cascading planetary risks including climate change and other accelerated changes in earth systems creating risks and challenges but also some opportunities. - disruptive technologies which will alter production, supply chains and consumption patterns. • Food systems transformation is required to effectively address environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity loss and water impacts, as well as increased incidence of malnutrition and non-communicable diseases resulting from current food and dietary choices. • There is a significant pipeline of technological innovations and developments which will help to re-orient food systems– however overcoming the challenges we are facing is unlikely by relying only on a “technological fix”. There is also a need to engage in dialogue and assess the contribution of values, social sciences, policies and regulation, market incentives to making positive change in our food systems and creating transition pathways. • The impacts of climate change on agriculture in Australia are already being felt – with estimates that there has already been a decrease in productivity of around 22% due to climate change. There have been effective examples of climate adaptation to date in Australia (including in water efficiency and cropping systems) but there is work still to be done. There is a need to recognise the limits of adaptive approaches which seek to increase production efficiencies and research systematic and transformational adaptation across all the elements of food systems (from R&D through to production, supply chains and consumption). • Trade is a key means of climate adaptation and will be increasingly needed under future climates. • There is an important role for value-adding processes in Australian food systems (including by increased development and manufacturing of “healthy” manufactured foods) and a need to better understand and recognise the benefits this offers for Australian agricultural supply chains (including expanded competitive advantage). • Promoting collaboration between stakeholders along the supply chain (including farmers and manufacturers) will be important. Innovative models are being explored in Australia to build relationships between growers, manufacturers, service providers, logistics companies and others to improve value creation along the supply chain. A special-feature panellist highlighted how the Australian livestock sectors are working to increase their resilience and deliver environmental, economic and socially responsible sustainability outcomes, exploring: • The contribution of industry sustainability frameworks and the importance of economic and business models which incentivise industry stakeholders to invest in innovation which supports sustainable development pathways; • The critical role of increased investment in R&D and stable, science-based industry and government policy that incentivises economic development, environmental stewardship and holistic wellbeing of producers, consumers and other stakeholders in the supply chain. A second special-feature webinar panellist gave a short presentation on the role of the food-rescue and food-relief sector for helping to manage supply chain disruptions, exploring: • How stakeholders respond adaptively and employ systems thinking approaches to overcome supply chain vulnerabilities and disruptions to get food to where it is needed in times of crisis, including in response to natural disasters. • The barriers which prevent healthier and more appropriate food options being available to communities and the imperative to ensure that “no one is left behind”. The question and answer session was wide-ranging and reflected strong stakeholder engagement and interest. Some key thematic elements of the discussion related to: • the need to ensure coordination and balance between health, agricultural and environmental outcomes, • structuring of value chains and ensuring appropriate incentives are flowing from consumers (“demand pull”) are in place to encourage producers to ‘grow the right thing’, • the contributions of the red meat sector to increasing resilience, • the role and growth of plant-based alternative proteins in sustainable, resilient and healthy food systems, • the urban/rural divide and how it may exacerbate differences in valuing and understanding sustainable landscapes, • the critical role of technology in tackling food systems issues and boosting resilience, • the role of policy changes and power asymmetries in food systems and how to better “internalise” environmental and social impacts which are currently “externalities” in the true price of food. Скрыть

This report seeks to summarise views and perspectives of webinar participants and does not necessarily represent the views of the Australian Government. In addition to the topics already highlighted – there were a number of additional high-level key messages emerging during the dialogue discussion, including: • There is a continued need to foster the development of innovative approaches, solutions, and research outcomes that meets the needs of producers, consumers and other stakeholders along the supply chain, in order to boost resilience to future shocks and vulnerabilities facing food sy... Подробнееstems. • Approaches which emphasise the importance of collaboration will be critically important. Connected, integrated and agile food systems, which are underpinned by robust data and information networks, will be fundamental to resilient food systems, allowing stakeholders across food systems supply chains to make accurate and informed decisions to minimise the impact of future shocks and vulnerabilities. • The flow of information and market incentives from consumers to producers (and vice versa) is an important driver of food systems development and function. It will be important to improve connectivity in the value chain to ensure it is demand driven and reflects consumer wants and values, including relating to provenance. Ensuring the right products are grown in the right regions and facilitating the path to market is important for food security for all Australians. • Increased collaboration and relationship building between different levels of stakeholders in food systems also can bring about positive outcomes – including in the establishment of new “value-adding” industries which can strengthen the agri-food sector and its important contribution to the Australian economy. There are also many positive benefits and efficiencies to be found in further digitalisation and modernisation of the “logistics” of trading regulations and practices. • There is a need to incorporate “systems thinking” in our decision making for our food systems. There is a need to think beyond productivity metrics and consider multiple objectives and values. This will involve a need to consider indirect impacts and trade-offs of certain actions and policies. It will be necessary to promote collaborative approaches to achieve a joint and shared vision for our food systems and the transition pathways we may embark upon to get there. Скрыть

This report seeks to summarise views and perspectives of webinar participants and does not represent the views of the Australian Government. In addition to the key messages already detailed there were a number of issues discussed which may have signified a divergence of views, including: • Exploration of the divergent environmental impact that can be attributed to certain food groups (i.e. red meat, horticultural products, grains, alternative plant protein and other animal products). It was highlighted that environmental impact is highly circumstantial and determined by the highly localised ... Подробнееand specific production/consumption context. Assessment of the nutritional and sustainability credentials of food groups is a highly complex and difficult undertaking – which is highly unlikely to be broadly or “globally” applicable. • There is a need to consider how best to manage competing trade-offs “between” different dimensions of healthy and sustainable diets (i.e. between environmental, health and nutrition and economic outcomes). Similarly, there is a need to consider trade-offs “within” one dimension. For instance, food choices can involve differing environmental impacts across a range of indicators including water consumption, GHG emissions and soil quality. Navigating these trade-offs and consumption choices is to some extent dependent on producer and consumer values. • Discussion around new and emerging food products, including around the role of reformulating ‘processed’ foods to improve nutritional characteristics. Similarly there was discussion around plant-based meat-alternatives and their role in healthy and sustainable diets. • Highlighting of potential inefficiencies in Australian food supply chains and discussion of where innovations and change can best be targeted to leverage positive change with the greatest return for investment. • Discussion around the role of education programs in schools that can target a range of dietary behaviours and be responsive to the differing needs of families– including focusing on activities and behaviour change both at home and at school. • Discussion around the value of sustainability labelling for foods for achieving better health and nutrition outcomes. The various complexities associated with developing appropriate metrics were discussed. • Discussion around the roles, responsibilities and opportunities for various stakeholders across food supply chains for improved collaboration, networking and relationship building. Improved connectivity and coordination between stakeholders can generate production, distribution efficiencies and ultimately ensure improved environmental and nutritional outcomes for Australian food systems. Скрыть

As the third in the series of Australian National Food Systems Summit Dialogues hosted by the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, the major focus of this webinar "Eating for our health and the environment - balancing nutrition and sustainability" was to explore: • current and emerging food choices and the intersection between diet / nutrition and environmental sustainability in Australia • various initiatives, innovations and research along the supply chain which seeks to balance environmental/nutrition considerations • innovative approaches to addressing food loss and ... Подробнееwaste. We were pleased to have the participation of the following panellists to lead discussion: • Professor Amanda Lee, Professor in Public Health Policy, University of Queensland • Dr Bradley Ridoutt, Principal Research Scientist, CSIRO • Mark Barthel, Fight Food Waste CRC • Ronni Kahn AO, CEO and Founder, Ozharvest Скрыть

This report seeks to summarise views and perspectives of webinar participants and does not represent the views of the Australian Government. Three expert panellists explored the webinar themes outlined previously – delivering short presentations to webinar participants. Key messages highlighted during these presentations included: • There can be important synergies between a healthy diet for people and for the planet. Key changes required in Australia may involve decreasing food waste, decreasing energy intake, decreasing intake of unhealthy food and drinks, and increasing the proportion o... Подробнееf healthy plant-based foods in diets. • Australia has food and nutrition policy frameworks, yet there is a need for greater implementation of evidence-based actions, regulatory action and renewed engagement with experts and other stakeholders. Approximately less than 1% of Australians consume diets consistent with the food based dietary guidelines. Greater adherence to the current guidelines by the Australian populace would likely deliver significant health and environmental benefits. • There is a perception that healthy food is “too expensive” however there is significant discrepancy as to the relative affordability of “healthy” and “unhealthy” diets for the Australian population, as affordability can be significantly affected by factors such as socio-economic status and geographical. For example, low-income Australians may make dietary choices influenced primarily by monetary cost, and as such “unhealthy” food choices tend to be cheaper than “healthy ones.” There are also significant issues with food access and affordability, particularly in remote communities. • Discretionary foods currently account for over 35% of the total energy intake of the average Australian diet (a proportion much higher than the recommended daily nutritional intake). It was also suggested that the production and consumption of discretionary foods can have a significant environmental and climate impact. • To deliver healthy and sustainable diets, it is important to focus equally on the “production side” (i.e. resource use efficiency, lower GHG emissions associated with food production) as on the “consumption side” (i.e. nutritional guidance and influencing consumer choice). • Food waste is a global issue, including for Australia. Reducing food loss and waste has multiple benefits across the food system including economic benefits for business and households, environmental benefits (particularly water and climate), and increased food availability and security. • In Australia, one-fifth to one-quarter of Australian food waste occurs during primary production, with another one-fifth occurring during manufacturing. In comparison, across other OECD countries, food waste is very heavily concentrated towards the consumption end of the value chain. • One-third of fresh produce is wasted in Australia, which has significant implications for food security given the lost nutritional value from these foods. • There is a vibrant and exciting role for innovation and start-ups focused on transforming surplus food and by-products into valuable ingredients and products. This can help significantly to reduce food loss and waste, create economic value and value-adding industries, reduce environmental pressure and increase the availability of healthy food products. A special-feature webinar panellist gave a short presentation on OzHarvest, an Australian food rescue charity that aims to reduce food waste and feed hungry people. The presentation highlighted: • Various activities undertaken to give effect to the goal of halving food waste by 2030 in Australia • Education programs for youth and children on how to prepare, store and value food • The opportunity for individuals in Australia to significantly reduce their contribution to combat climate change by reducing their food waste • Simplifying messaging around food waste to the mantra: look, buy, store, cook The question and answer session was wide-ranging reflecting strong stakeholder engagement and interest. Some key thematic elements of the discussion related to: • the role of quality health information, advertising, social marketing campaigns, and the standardisation of nutritional guidelines, readily accessible and available to the public (including schools); • local food production environments and the significantly divergent environmental impact of production across regions and production systems; • the role of agricultural technology and innovation for reducing food loss and waste during production; • the interactions between food regulations and specifications and the creation/reduction of food waste • opportunities for value-adding and higher farm-gate return through reduction in food loss/waste and responding to changes in consumer behaviour and demand; • the role of plant-based meat alternatives and their contribution to a health and sustainable diet; • the concept of “food miles” and their utility for determining accurately the environmental impact of food; • complexities associated with sustainable, environmental or GHG emission labelling for foods; • complexities of the health star rating system for foods in Australian supermarkets and the role of food labelling in reducing food loss and wastage. Скрыть

This report seeks to summarise views and perspectives of webinar participants and does not represent the views of the Australian Government. In addition to the topics already highlighted – there were a number of additional high-level key messages emerging during the dialogue discussion, including: • A sustainable and healthy diet is one that has low environmental impact and contributes to food security and health for people now, and into the future. Food systems have a critical role in the provision of health, sustainability, and equity outcomes. Various case studies demonstrate positive c... Подробнееhanges, including in several remote Aboriginal communities which have successfully improved health, sustainability and equity through dietary change and improved food security. • Trade-offs can become evident when making dietary and policy choices to balance environmental and health outcomes (i.e. lower GHG emissions diet versus adequate macro/micro nutrient intake) and sometimes achieving one outcome occurs at the expense of achieving another – however, there can also be synergies – and these are important to recognise and utilise. • Food systems (including production and consumption patterns) are highly specific to regions and countries – and there is a need to design and implement solutions to improve sustainability and health outcomes, which reflect the reality of national and regional food systems. It was acknowledged that solutions should seek to recognise the importance of achieving outcomes across health, sustainability and be science-based. Australian solutions should draw heavily upon the evidence base from Australia. • Comprehensive and clear national food policies and guidelines, frameworks and targets can be of significant value to both producers and consumers, and can help to underpin improved nutritional and environmental outcomes and encourage a transition towards healthy, sustainable diets. • There is a need to ensure that innovations, solutions, regulation, and research are designed with the needs of all stakeholders across the supply chain and distribution networks in mind. Taking a systems approach when considering how to improve health and sustainability outcomes (including as it relates to reducing food loss and waste) is important, to be able to determine interlinkages and impacts of interventions. • Network diagramming of Australian health and food professionals revealed strong siloing between groups such as academics, decision makers, farmers, nutritionists, and consumers. Compounding this is the level of complexity across the food system. Building relationships, communication and collaboration across the food system will be needed to shift the current siloed culture to overcome complexities and create food systems that are flexible, intelligent, and transparent. Скрыть

As the fourth in the series of the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (DAWE) led Australian National FSS Dialogues, the Australian Food Systems – addressing shared challenges webinar explored: • how we can think holistically about food systems and work to meet the triple challenge of providing food security and nutrition, delivering strong livelihoods throughout the supply chain and ensuring environmental sustainability; • the notion of “trade-offs” and synergies in food systems; and • the need for decisions to be underpinned by rigorous science and evidence whils... Подробнееt acknowledging and managing diverse stakeholder interests and values. We were pleased to have the participation of the following panellists to lead discussion: • Lee Ann Jackson, Head of Division, Agro-food Trade and Markets, OECD • Dr Anne Astin PSM, Chair of the Board, Food Agility CRC • Howard Parry-Husbands, CEO of Pollinate • Krista Singleton-Cambage, Head of Climate and Food Security, World Wildlife Fund Australia. Скрыть

This report seeks to summarise views and perspectives of webinar participants and does not necessarily represent the views of the Australian Government. A scene-setting presentation was delivered exploring the webinar themes outlined previously. Key messages highlighted during this presentation included: • The COVID-19 crisis has brought renewed attention to the importance of food systems and their role in meeting the triple challenge – delivering food security and nutrition, providing livelihoods for stakeholders across food supply chains and ensuring environmental sustainability. • Foo... Подробнееd systems have delivered significant accomplishments in recent decades - including quadrupling of agricultural production since 1960 and decoupling production from agricultural land expansion through efficiency gains – however there remain shortcomings relating to food security and malnutrition and the environmental impact of food production. Better policies can make a difference to solving these issues. • While many of the challenges facing food systems are well-understood, there is often less focus on the identification and development of appropriate policy solutions. Many agri-food policies currently implemented globally are not effectively addressing the triple challenge and may be exacerbating the challenges in some instances. This can include distorting policy instruments – such as those providing production incentives to individual producers – which can lead to significant environmental externalities and international agricultural market distortion. • Developing coherent agri-food policies requires policymakers to be aware of possible trade-offs and synergies with other policy areas. For instance, agricultural sector policy interventions are likely to impact health or environmental outcomes and vice-versa. It is important for policymakers to vigorously evaluate possible interactions across food systems and look to maximise synergies and effectively manage any unavoidable “trade-offs.” There is unlikely to be a “silver-bullet” policy instrument – and there is a need to consider using a mix of policy instruments and approaches. • Sometimes there may be a need for difficult discussions, debate and choices around “trade-offs.” These decisions can be made made more difficult as occasionally stakeholder perspectives on certain issues can be primarily informed by values. There is a need for policymakers to appreciate the role of facts, interests and values in policy debates and to use innovative approaches to bridge gaps and create opportunities for better understanding and collaboration between competing stakeholder interests. Panellists were asked to provide some initial thoughts and reflections on the scene-setting presentation, which included: • Emphasis on the importance of holistic approaches for food policy making – noting in Australia that a core focus has traditionally been on agri-food sector competitiveness to underpin our economic wellbeing. • The importance of overcoming challenges relating to data collection and using it appropriately and effectively to enable better policymaking – while ensuring that food remains accessible, high quality and is aligned with consumer demand. • Recognition that complex systems have fundamental characteristics and traits which need to be acknowledged – for instance, they are constantly evolving and there are complex interactions and consequences (both known and unknown) for different policy interventions. There is likely to be a need for mixed policy approaches which are coherent (for instance across production and consumption sides), recognise complexity and employ “systems thinking”. • The need for taking an inclusive approach which seeks to consult widely and consider the needs and views of diverse stakeholder groups. Through its engagement and leadership in the Asia-Pacific region, there is also a role for Australia in helping our international partners to address the triple challenge through better policymaking for food systems. The question-and-answer session was wide-ranging reflecting strong stakeholder engagement and interest. Some key thematic elements of the discussion related to: • Navigating challenges and opportunities for agri-food policymaking as consumers increasingly make food choices according to environmental, social and ethical considerations. • The role of deliberative processes for effectively dealing with “trade-offs” and ensuring diverse stakeholder engagement and representation, including at the local/regional government level. • The critical need for more and improved data on food systems at the local, national and global level for food systems policy and decision making. • How best to take food systems conversations and discussions forward, to promote improved coherency and policymaking across sectors. Скрыть

This report seeks to summarise views and perspectives of webinar participants and does not necessarily represent the views of the Australian Government. In addition to the topics already highlighted – there were a number of additional high-level key messages emerging during the dialogue discussion, including: • Exploration of future food systems and the most crucial actions needed to ensure that our food systems are delivering on the triple challenge of economic livelihoods, health/nutrition and environmental outcomes. These included the need to address current gaps and flaws in data, a la... Подробнееck of diversity in stakeholder engagement, conflicts over facts and interest groups, and a lack of traceability in the supply chain. • It was suggested that consumers may be feeling “guilt-fatigue” as they continue to receive conflicting messages around the ethical and environmental consequences of their consumption choices. For this reason improving traceability could be one of the most promising tools for improving consumer trust and transparency in Australian food systems. Better collection and use of datasets will be crucial along the supply chain to provide assurance of health, environmental and social outcomes to consumers and producers alike. • There is a need to improve data collection and “knowledge production” practices to facilitate better collaboration, assessment and analysis and ultimately policymaking, potentially through the implementation of data standards or a more coordinated approach. This may also involve some consideration of the role of future “data markets” and “data trading”. • Policymakers need access to better quality datasets to inform food systems decision making. There is a need for greater collaboration across the supply chain to better analyse and interpret the data we have, and to identify where there may be gaps. A key priority for food systems policy related data is being able to quantify assessed policy trade-offs and their respective impacts, to inform better decision making. • Effective food systems policy making relies on consultation and engagement with diverse stakeholders. Deliberative processes can be useful in policymaking to overcome differences in stakeholder views, interests and values, and can lead to more transparent and equitable decision-making. • The era of digital technology and innovations provides huge opportunities for producers and other stakeholders in the food sector to reduce inputs and improve efficiencies. This includes proper assessment of the contributions and supporting architecture for satellite technology in helping to collect, manage and store agricultural and food system data. Скрыть