Независимый Диалог
Местоположение:
Без границ
Area of divergence
Most discussion groups did not generate explicit areas of divergence, though it became clear across the seven tables that these areas existed and are part of the challenge of developing effective multi-stakeholder initiatives. Several groups stressed that divergence is important, as it broadens perspectives, and surfacing and appreciating differences is a key step towards becoming an effective MSP. The key areas of divergence that emerged during the dialogue are as follows: -Different actors have different views on how successful the various multi-stakeholder platforms have been. These differe
... Подробнееnt perspectives have been voiced during the dialogue sessions and were the background against which recommendations for success were made. -Participants realised that they may have different expectations on the effectiveness of a multi-stakeholder initiative. Some of them indicated that some initiatives, which have been initiated from The Netherlands for example, may not be responsive to the needs and perspectives of the less powerful food systems actors in Africa or Asia, even when its design is of good quality and the Dutch or international actors involved have the proper expertise and experience. -Funding instruments that have been created to facilitate public-private collaboration in the agrifood sector are considered innovative and helpful by some, whereas others find them too bureaucratic or hard to work with. -Some participants indicated they missed the discussion on access to land - as a crucial discussion to have. -Multi-stakeholder platforms risk being just ‘talk shops’ for some, who are reluctant to engage in them if there is no concrete action and if they don’t see a clear benefit or added value for them. -While some participants think we shouldn´t "impose" top-down blueprint solutions but develop local solutions, others think that solutions that have already proven successful in a given context can be scaled up and replicated in other settings. -Some participants called for more attention to end ‘siloed’ thinking and to working in a more integrated manner. Скрыть
Направления деятельности: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Ключевые слова: Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy, Trade-offs, Women & Youth Empowerment