Explore le compte-rendu officiel des Concertations

Concertations de États membres: 490 Concertations intergouvernementales: 6 Concertations indépendantes: 683 Concertations mondiales pour le Sommet: 10

Cette page permet à toute personne d'explorer les réponses des Coordonnateurs de Concertation à la section 4 des Concertations du Sommet sur les systèmes alimentaires Formulaire de compte-rendu officiel. La section 4 est organisée en 4 sous-sections qui permettent aux Coordonnateurs de détailler le « Thème Principal » de leur Concertation ainsi que les résultats, y compris les « Principales conclusions », les « Résultats pour chaque Sujet de Discussion » et les « Domaines de Divergence ». Tout le monde peut utiliser ces informations pour élaborer sa propre synthèse de Compte-rendu de Concertation. C'est pourquoi les résultats peuvent également être filtrés par Piste d'Action ou par mot-clé. Les synthèses des Comptes-rendus Officiels officiels doivent respecter les Principes d'Engagement du Sommet sur les systèmes alimentaires et utilisé dans le cadre de la Concertation qui a eu lieu.

Pour les chercheurs et les synthèses avancées, un export XML est disponible ici (dernière mise à jour ).

Concertation Indépendante

Les dynamiques de production, de diversification, de transformation et de conservation / stockage garantissent une qualité nutritionnelle et sanitaire des aliments et une souveraineté alimentaire au profit des populations

Cible géographique: Afghanistan, Algérie, Angola, Argentine, Australie, Autriche, Belgique, Bénin, Brésil, Burkina Faso, Cameroun, Canada, République centrafricaine, Tchad, Chili, Chine, Colombie, Comores, Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, République populaire démocratique de Corée, République démocratique du Congo, Danemark, Djibouti, Égypte, Guinée équatoriale, Eswatini, Éthiopie, Union européenne, France, Gabon, Gambie, Allemagne, Ghana, Grèce, Guinée, Guinée-Bissau, Inde, Indonésie, Iran (République islamique d’), Iraq, Italie, Jordanie, Kenya, Libéria, Libye, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Mali, Mauritanie, Maroc, Népal, Pays-Bas, Niger, Nigéria, Pérou, Portugal, République de Corée, Rwanda, Arabie saoudite, Sénégal, Sierra Leone, Afrique du Sud, Soudan du Sud, Soudan, Suède, République arabe syrienne, Thaïlande, Togo, Tunisie, Ouganda, Émirats arabes unis, Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord, États-Unis d’Amérique, Venezuela (République bolivarienne du), Viet Nam, Yémen

Discussion topic outcome

THÈME 1 : LES DYNAMIQUES DE PRODUCTION, DE DIVERSIFICATION, DE TRANSFORMATION ET DE CONSERVATION/STOCKAGE GARANTISSANT UNE QUALITÉ NUTRITIONNELLE ET SANITAIRE DES ALIMENTS ET UNE SOUVERAINETÉ ALIMENTAIRE AU PROFIT DES POPULATIONS Sous thème 1 : Les systèmes de production (agroécologique et biologique) locaux peuvent assurer la qualité des aliments produits au Burkina Faso et garantir une souveraineté alimentaire pour la décennie à venir Les principales recommandations issues de la Concertation sont : 1. développer la recherche-action en valorisant les savoirs locaux paysans, 2. disp... Lire la suiteonibiliser les intrants écologiques homologués ; 3. promouvoir un fonds vert dédié aux entrepreneurs/producteurs de l’agroécologie et du bio et appuyer les acteurs écologiques en équipement adapté ; 4. intégrer systématiquement le genre dans la recherche, la conception et le suivi des politiques nationales agricoles ; 5. prendre en compte et valoriser les savoirs endogènes et le patrimoine culturel/préférences des communautés locales dans les stratégies et politiques nationales ; 6. créer, renforcer et recycler les connaissances et les savoirs faire sur les techniques et pratiques écologiques; 7. promouvoir la consommation des produits écologiques et locaux. Sous-thème 2 : La diversification de production (prise en compte des changements climatiques) peut assurer une alimentation riche, saine et équilibrée au Burkina Faso dans les années à venir -Accentuer la recherche-action sur les effets bénéfiques des associations et des pratiques capables de maintenir la productivité car s’adaptant aux changements climatiques -Vulgariser davantage les bonnes pratiques en matière de diversification agricole (association, rotation de cultures) -Promouvoir l’association et la rotation des cultures à travers le renforcement des capacités y relatif ; -Assurer une intégration entre les diverses productions agro-sylvo-pastorales, halieutiques et fauniques -Prendre en compte l’Agroécologie et l’Agriculture bio dans les référentiels de développement (Référentiel National de Développement, Programme National du Secteur Rural phase III, etc.) -Promouvoir les bonnes pratiques en matière de diversification agricole (association, rotation de cultures) et adaptées aux changements climatiques -Assurer une intégration entre les diverses productions agro-sylvo-pastorales halieutiques et fauniques Sous-thème 3 : Les modes de transformation peuvent améliorer la qualité nutritionnelle et sanitaires des aliments au Burkina Faso dans les années à venir -Renforcer les capacités techniques et opérationnelles des centres / entreprises de transformation agroalimentaire -Renforcer l’appui-conseil et formation aux transformateurs pour le respect des bonnes pratiques de transformation et d’hygiène -Renforcer la concertation / collaboration entre transformateurs et les structures de normalisation -Renforcer le contrôle qualité et appliquer rigoureusement la loi en la matière -Accompagner les transformateurs en équipements de transformation adaptés et à prix subventionné Sous-thème 4 : Les pratiques de conservation et de stockage des produits alimentaires peuvent assurer la qualité nutritionnelle et sanitaire des produits au Burkina Faso dans un futur proche. Les circuits courts de commercialisation à l’échelle nationale, régionale et internationale permettent de garantir la qualité nutritionnelle et sanitaire des aliments au Burkina Faso -Soutenir les initiatives de promotion des circuits courts de commercialisation des produits agricoles dans la perspective de leur mise à l’échelle -Renforcer les capacités techniques et opérationnelles des acteurs sur les techniques de conservation/stockage des produits agricoles et alimentaires -Promouvoir des habitudes en faveur de la consommation locale, alternative à la mondialisation/uniformisation des habitudes alimentaires -Mettre en place des infrastructures de stockage/conservation de qualité et renforcer les capacités techniques et opérationnelles des acteurs dans ce domaine Ces recommandations d'actions seront priorisées, mises en œuvre par les acteurs des systèmes alimentaires avec des mécanismes périodiques de bilan-suivi-évaluation. Lire moins

Piste(s) d'Action: 1, 2, 3

Mots-clés : Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy

Concertation Indépendante

Les dynamiques de production, de diversification, de transformation et de conservation / stockage garantissent une qualité nutritionnelle et sanitaire des aliments et une souveraineté alimentaire au profit des populations

Major focus

De façon générale, la concertation indépendante vise à permettre aux participants de contribuer au Sommet en s’appuyant sur des approches innovantes, issues d’expériences vécues, conduisant à des systèmes alimentaires durables dans la perspective du Sommet. Plus spécifiquement, la Concertation indépendante vise à : Permettre aux organisations de la société civile (acteurs non-étatiques) de réfléchir ensemble à des idées alternatives de mise en place de systèmes alimentaires durables ; Diagnostiquer les problèmes des systèmes alimentaires au niveau mondial, sous-régio... Lire la suitenal et national ; Engager les OSC dans une approche innovante de réalisation des systèmes alimentaires durables mettant au centre l’agriculture familiale et l’agroécologie pour un Burkina Faso épanoui ; Élaborer ensemble des voies, des actions et des engagements pour aboutir à des systèmes alimentaires durables et équitables, et y perdurer jusqu’en 2030 au moins. Lire moins

Piste(s) d'Action: 1, 3

Mots-clés : Finance, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy

Concertation Indépendante

A Small Business Agenda for the Food Systems Summit

Cible géographique: Sans cible géographique

Major focus

The UN Food Systems Summit asked Wasafiri Consulting to engage SMEs all around the world to answer one big question – How to boost their role in providing good food for all? More than 2500 entrepreneurs completed a survey, with representation from 135 countries. Most of those entrepreneurs also went on to submit entries to the Summit’s Best Small Business competition where we heard more depth about their stories. We ran 11 dialogues in 7 languages with over 1000 participants, plus many of the other summit dialogues explored issues related to small businesses. Dozens of experts provided ins... Lire la suiteights, and we undertook a comprehensive literature review with the help of FAO. The focus of the dialogue was to present the findings of the Draft Report “A Small Business Agenda for the Food Systems Summit” which synthesised results of all that effort. The report highlights the essential role that SMEs must play in strengthening food systems, the constraints they face in elevating their positive impact, and offer recommended pathways to boost their contribution. The desired outcome of the dialogue was a joint statement presenting a collective SME voice to put forward to the pre-Summit and to continuing gathering endorsement up until the Summit in September. Lire moins

Piste(s) d'Action: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Mots-clés : Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy, Trade-offs, Women & Youth Empowerment

Concertation Indépendante

A Small Business Agenda for the Food Systems Summit

Cible géographique: Sans cible géographique

Main findings

Whilst they may individually be small, SMEs manage at least half of the multi trillion-dollar global food economy. Often overlooked, we have come to understand these SMEs as hidden heroes, who tirelessly ensure food gets on our tables, and collectively they have enormous influence over the future of food. They are also quiet revolutionaries, passionately pioneering better food in every corner of the world – whether that means making our food more nourishing, more sustainable, more equitable or more resilient. We learned that SMEs are change-makers in five different ways. Firstly, they integr... Lire la suiteate markets, strengthening supply chains where they are weakest. Most obviously they are linking smallholder farmers to markets, and in doing so provide services that improve farm productivity and profitability. Evidence clearly shows that this market integration reduces poverty and hunger, especially in rural areas where it is most persistant. Secondly, food SMEs create opportunities that improve equity. There is something about the universal nature of food that makes it an economic gateway for women, for youth, for indigenous and minority groups. These groups are a higher proportion of entrepreneurs and employees within food SMEs than you would expect compared to the average business in any country. Thirdly, SMEs are innovators, pioneering and scaling solutions for nutrition and sustainability – from zero-waste packaging, to alternative proteins, to regenerative farming practices. Often their role is to tap into known technology or business models, but then they make these work in a very specific context where they have nuanced understanding and local connections. Fourthly, they embody resilience. The SME response to COVID showed us that emphatically. Embedded within communities and landscapes, they have no option but to deal with shocks. But they are agile enough to pivot their business models and sustain services in the toughest of situations. Finally, SMEs and especially the entrepreneurs who run them, are influencers. Passionate about their products, their customers, their land, their staff, they are constantly advocating for better food and they are close enough and trusted enough to be changing hearts and minds all across our food systems. Lire moins

Piste(s) d'Action: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Mots-clés : Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy, Trade-offs, Women & Youth Empowerment

Concertation Indépendante

A Small Business Agenda for the Food Systems Summit

Cible géographique: Sans cible géographique

Discussion topic outcome

The first pathway focuses on simply creating a business ecosystem in which food SMEs thrive The food sector is often burdensome for SMEs. Running a food SME is hard, and market elements are frequently wrong- sized for them. When food entrepreneurs have a business environment which gives them a fair chance to compete in the market, they then thrive to the benefit of consumers, producers, communities, nature, and investors. We heard numerous opportunities for cross-sector actors to strengthen the business ecosystem for food SMEs. • We must reduce the cost of doing business for food SMEs. This ... Lire la suiteincludes improving physical and digital infrastructure, regulations, and the ensuring rule of law. • We must improve access to finance, which was by far the most common request by SMEs who felt financial products rarely met their needs. • Governments can ease the graduation of informal businesses into the formal sector. • At their best, large market actors like supermarkets or governments, can use their buying power to lift small businesses, by intentionally sourcing from and supporting them. • And lastly, we can target business support at food SMEs through initiatives like incubators and offering business development services. Lire moins

Piste(s) d'Action: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Mots-clés : Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy, Trade-offs, Women & Youth Empowerment

Concertation Indépendante

A Small Business Agenda for the Food Systems Summit

Cible géographique: Sans cible géographique

Discussion topic outcome

The second pathway aims to incentivise businesses to provide “Good Food for All” The best businesses are not always the most competitive, so they struggle to scale up. Most consumers currently prioritise price above all other factors, and good businesses cannot out-compete those who deliver their products whilst externalising their cost to public health, natural capital, or social equity. The food system will continue to fail us until these incentives change. Here, cross-sector actors also have opportunities to act: • We must ensure prices reflect the true cost of food, while also safegu... Lire la suitearding the affordability of food to poor consumers. The Summit’s Scientific Group has an excellent paper on how this might be achieved. • There is cultural shift required to create consumer demand for “good food”. Until we value food for how it nurtures the health of our bodies, our landscapes and our communities; then the preference for cheap calories will dominate market signals. • Lastly, fast-track the innovative entrepreneurs that promise positive disruption of our food systems. The ecosystem for innovation and entrepreneurship is essential to the pace of change needed over the next decade. Lire moins

Piste(s) d'Action: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Mots-clés : Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy, Trade-offs, Women & Youth Empowerment

Concertation Indépendante

A Small Business Agenda for the Food Systems Summit

Cible géographique: Sans cible géographique

Discussion topic outcome

The third and last pathway addresses an underlying issue. We must increase the power of food SMEs within sector planning. Small businesses have quiet and isolated voices. Compared to government or large businesses, they are relatively under- powered in their ability to collectively influence decision-making, regulations, resource allocation, and cultural values within food systems. Only once power dynamics change can we expect to make progress on rebalancing food systems in favour of the SMEs pioneering good food for all. This is especially true for the women entrepreneurs and those from other... Lire la suite marginalised groups who both face additional barriers and are some of the most fervent champions of change. Again, there are clear opportunities to act to address this power dynamic. • Cross-sector actors must all elevate the voice of SMEs. Make sure they are consulted as, for example regulations get changed, as sector programmes get designed, or financial products are taken to market. • Then, help structure SMEs into dynamic networks. In places like Belgium, where food SMEs organise together, they are better able to influence and respond to national planning. • Finally, and this is really a cross-cutting issue, plan and invest in food SMEs according to their context-specific priorities. The changes needed by entreprenuers in Singapore versus Tanzania, or indeed in those in alternative proteins versus regenerative livestock, are different. Lire moins

Piste(s) d'Action: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Mots-clés : Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy, Trade-offs, Women & Youth Empowerment

Concertation Indépendante

A Small Business Agenda for the Food Systems Summit

Cible géographique: Sans cible géographique

Discussion topic outcome

The third and last pathway addresses an underlying issue. We must increase the power of food SMEs within sector planning. Small businesses have quiet and isolated voices. Compared to government or large businesses, they are relatively under-powered in their ability to collectively influence decision-making, regulations, resource allocation, and cultural values within food systems. Only once power dynamics change can we expect to make progress on rebalancing food systems in favour of the SMEs pioneering good food for all. This is especially true for the women entrepreneurs and those from other ... Lire la suitemarginalised groups who both face additional barriers and are some of the most fervent champions of change. Again, there are clear opportunities to act to address this power dynamic. • Cross-sector actors must all elevate the voice of SMEs. Make sure they are consulted as, for example regulations get changed, as sector programmes get designed, or financial products are taken to market. • Then, help structure SMEs into dynamic networks. In places like Belgium, where food SMEs organise together, they are better able to influence and respond to national planning. • Finally, and this is really a cross-cutting issue, plan and invest in food SMEs according to their context-specific priorities. The changes needed by entreprenuers in Singapore versus Tanzania, or indeed in those in alternative proteins versus regenerative livestock, are different. Lire moins

Piste(s) d'Action: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Mots-clés : Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy, Trade-offs, Women & Youth Empowerment

Concertation Indépendante

A Small Business Agenda for the Food Systems Summit

Cible géographique: Sans cible géographique

Major focus

Piste(s) d'Action: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Mots-clés : Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy, Trade-offs, Women & Youth Empowerment

Concertation Indépendante

A Small Business Agenda for the Food Systems Summit

Cible géographique: Sans cible géographique

Main findings

Piste(s) d'Action: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Mots-clés : Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy, Trade-offs, Women & Youth Empowerment

Concertation Indépendante

A Small Business Agenda for the Food Systems Summit

Cible géographique: Sans cible géographique

Discussion topic outcome

The first pathway focuses on simply creating a business ecosystem in which food SMEs thrive The food sector is often burdensome for SMEs. Running a food SME is hard, and market elements are frequently wrong-sized for them. When food entrepreneurs have a business environment which gives them a fair chance to compete in the market, they then thrive to the benefit of consumers, producers, communities, nature, and investors. We heard numerous opportunities for cross-sector actors to strengthen the business ecosystem for food SMEs. • We must reduce the cost of doing business for food SMEs. This i... Lire la suitencludes improving physical and digital infrastructure, regulations, and the ensuring rule of law. • We must improve access to finance, which was by far the most common request by SMEs who felt financial products rarely met their needs. • Governments can ease the graduation of informal businesses into the formal sector. • At their best, large market actors like supermarkets or governments, can use their buying power to lift small businesses, by intentionally sourcing from and supporting them. • And lastly, we can target business support at food SMEs through initiatives like incubators and offering business development services. Lire moins

Piste(s) d'Action: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Mots-clés : Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy, Trade-offs, Women & Youth Empowerment

Concertation Indépendante

A Small Business Agenda for the Food Systems Summit

Cible géographique: Sans cible géographique

Discussion topic outcome

Piste(s) d'Action: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Mots-clés : Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy, Trade-offs, Women & Youth Empowerment

Concertation Indépendante

Stories of Radical Resilience

Cible géographique: Bolivie (État plurinational de), Brésil, Canada, Chili, Égypte, Jordanie, Liban, Mongolie, Suisse, Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord, États-Unis d’Amérique

Discussion topic outcome

“WHAT ARE THE KEY INGREDIENTS OF BUILDING RESILIENCE?” Top takeaways from each breakout below. Full outputs https://miro.com/app/board/o9J_l_NW9YE=/ (ENG): Inclusive Learning & Labour 1. Continuous learning and a community that supports and allows for it. Having a role model, sharing vulnerability, and feeling a sense of belonging also allows for organic growth Inclusive learning- which is much more a family than a traditional colonial/institutional model of education that is top-down. 2. Peer-to-peer learning and working within your community creates multipliers and fosters resilience... Lire la suite 3. The move from fear to strength. Being self-taught and creative problem solving out of necessity and a desire for a better future for yourself and those around you. (ESP): El Aprendizaje y Trabajo Inclusivos (Inclusive Learning & Labour) 1. The power of the collective: we lift each other up by doing so we become stronger together 2. Giving chances, to everyone, especially for those who need the opportunity 3. Helping others reach their truest potential and empowering them to grow Lire moins

Piste(s) d'Action: 4, 5

Mots-clés : Human rights, Innovation, Women & Youth Empowerment

Concertation Indépendante

Stories of Radical Resilience

Discussion topic outcome

Three ingredients of building resilience through Food Security & Social Cohesion 1. Confidence in our ability to recover. Nobody is born with resilience but it does go inside of us: going through difficulties makes us stronger 2. A support system to help us get up in the morning when it becomes too difficult 3. The will to leave a trace and making life better for others, not accepting things as they are

Piste(s) d'Action: 1, 5

Mots-clés : Human rights, Innovation, Women & Youth Empowerment

Concertation Indépendante

Stories of Radical Resilience

Discussion topic outcome

Three ingredients of building resilience Food Justice & Community Education 1. Commitment to a cause and commitment to finding solutions TOGETHER 2.Empathy for yourself and your community. 'We instead of me.' Empathy is the ingredient you find within yourself: finding empathy for others makes you more resilient too 3.Knowledge: also goes into empathy, as you first may have to learn about the problems others are facing. Also includes knowledge about food and nutrition (ESP) El Liderazgo Comunitario (Community leadership) 1. The fight is worth it. If you can, fight for hope. 2. Create networ... Lire la suiteks that care for and empower leaders. 3. We can all be leaders from the experience of our realities. Lire moins

Piste(s) d'Action: 5

Mots-clés : Governance, Human rights, Innovation

Concertation Indépendante

Stories of Radical Resilience

Discussion topic outcome

Three ingredients of building resilience through Social Entrepreneurship 1. Clear vision to give you purpose and priority; 2. Inclusion- businesses and entrepreneurs have a responsibility to include people in the conversion 3. Mindset and awareness- building an education network based on hope and open-mindedness

Piste(s) d'Action: 4, 5

Mots-clés : Human rights, Innovation, Women & Youth Empowerment

Concertation Indépendante

Stories of Radical Resilience

Area of divergence

To change the conversation, we must change who is sitting around the table. We convened and conceived of the event in an unconventional way from the offset so, in that sense, we had already diverged from the status quo. Who did we bring who are not normally in the room? Resiliencers sharing their own experience instead of a representative from an organisation Artists sharing their perspective in their language of choice - art Youth - engaging the younger audience - need to see the participant split What did we do that diverged from the dialogue template? We started with a discourse to allow pe... Lire la suiteople who do not usually have a voice in forums like these to take the stage, and we allowed for questions and answers before bringing in the dialogue. What surprised us? How self-determined our protagonists are and how intentional they are about owning and leading their future, and empowering those around them. Lire moins

Piste(s) d'Action: 5

Mots-clés : Human rights, Innovation, Women & Youth Empowerment

Concertation Indépendante

Stories of Radical Resilience

Major focus

“Poor people are the world’s greatest entrepreneurs. Every day, they must innovate in order to survive. They remain poor because they do not have the opportunities to turn their creativity into sustainable income.” ~ Pr. Muhammad Yunus Too often, those most affected and most vulnerable to shocks and stresses in our food system are left out of the conversation and excluded from decisions that affect them. In this Dialogue, we wanted to share first-hand accounts and learn directly from the frontline of resilience. We focused on sharing and learning from stories of people, resiliencers, who... Lire la suite have been affected firsthand by food insecurity and came up with radical solutions to feed themselves and their loved ones. The possibility this Dialogue offered was to listen and learn from examples of community resilience to food insecurity that renew hope and the way we work together to replicate the success globally. In addition, we made art an integral part of our Dialogue. By bringing artists together with our storytellers and changing the people at the table, we allowed diverse opinions and different languages to tell and translate stories of resilience. We wanted to prove that creativity and art can lead to different solutions that deviate from the norm. Lire moins

Piste(s) d'Action: 5

Mots-clés : Data & Evidence, Innovation, Women & Youth Empowerment

Concertation Indépendante

Stories of Radical Resilience

Main findings

“Resilience is not an ability one actively decides to acquire. It stems from a place of discomfort. In difficult times, empathy for our community sparks something within ourselves. By caring for each other and nurturing each other we strengthen our sense of community which in turn strengthens our individual resilience. But resilience should be thought of as a communal strength rather than an individualistic one.” ~ quote from a young artist at our Dialogue Watch summary: https://youtu.be/OJompq3IFPE&t=1783s The findings of this dialogue center on the human element of building resilienc... Lire la suitee to inform and complement other efforts of solution-building. Here, we focused on the common patterns, insights and takeaways that emerged as a whole. The outputs of the breakout discussions are included in the next section. I. The value of dialogue and power of inclusion to create change 1. Shift in dynamics: The speakers participated in the breakouts as equals rather than as beneficiaries, speaking with authority. We observed a different level of engagement when it is the changemaker representing themselves sharing their reality, their definition of success and their dream. Bringing resilience leaders and role models to the table is essential to shift the narrative and the power relations. 2. Shift in language: The vernacular changed from “they” to “we” when we bring the resiliencer and the community to the table to join the conversation. 3. Keeping the problems and solutions real. It's just as important to have ears as well as voice to input, create the right options, and make decisions. Not to mention enabling efficiency and transparency. How can we enable this level of engagement consistently? 4. "I am not alone" was a sentiment expressed by more than one of our seven changemakers during the dialogue. This dialogue actually turned out to be an opportunity for them to learn from each others’ journeys. 5. Who are we actually inspiring? An unforeseen outcome of the dialogue was that one of our speaker’s stories was shared on national TV in Chile, reaching millions. Melyna Montes won a “Mujeres que Inspiran” (Inspiring Women) Award by Banco de Chile. Sharing each other's stories and learnings is a source of inspiration not just for organisations but for the communities and individuals as well. II. Art to inspire action (Full artwork https://www.socialgastronomy.org/sgm-stories/2021/6/18/at5-artwork Art, like food, builds bridges of understanding and can inspire feeling, imagination and creativity which in turn generate further dialogue and action. Our artists listened to the diverse opinions, contexts and languages to channel their equally diverse visual representations of their learnings. Creativity was named an important factor for achieving resilience. This factor can lead to different, innovative solutions that deviate from the norm. How can we cultivate a complementary space? III. The needs and "key ingredients of building resilience" 1. Resilience is as much about the mindset as the actions: Consistently, each speaker had a clear sense of purpose, the drive to pursue their mission and belief in themselves. Leaders also need support and care in return. 2. Feed the desire for learning and education that include: - Opportunities to learn, to gain employment and being given a fair chance. - A nourishing, supportive environment with role models and peers that uphold important values such as empathy, collaboration, courage, initiative, solidarity in order for leaders and multipliers to grow into their potential. 3. “More than the delivery of help is the delivery of possibilities''. Cultivate a partnership mindset: "Accompany us", "walk in our steps" to build the capacity for resilience together no matter if it’s a charity, NGO, business or individual. 4. Community and a sense of belonging are central to building resilience no matter the setting (restaurant, neighbourhood, refugee camp, rural village, etc). While self-determination is a foundational quality of those who shared stories of overcoming challenges, a solid support system, role models and a safe space for expressing vulnerability allows us to grow organically and find a place where we not only survive, but we thrive. 5. At a systemic or intersectional level, there were commonalities that encompassed many crucial values and principles. Cultivating empathy is key for building capacity for resilience. It can be found within ourselves, and when we have empathy for others, we become more resilient by proxy. When we do something to better the lives of those around us, it becomes easier to continue fighting for their futures. IV. Barriers and challenges 1. Basic access to participate and connect is limited for many vulnerable communities and local leaders who are often not well connected externally, relying on their partner organisation as an interface. Not all leaders (decision makers) provide transparency to guide the end group to help them find a way and join the system actively. Facilitating the route for communities is key. This includes tech barriers, access to utilities and resources, the right networks, knowledge and language. 2. Focus on what’s in front of us: Reinforcing our basic human rights and ethics is key to creating the environment for building resilience: equal opportunities, labour laws, upholding agency and dignity, food security as a human right. 3. How can we conduct inclusive multi-lingual, multi-regional, multi-stakeholder experiences better to facilitate connection, collaboration and participation. Lire moins

Piste(s) d'Action: 1, 4, 5

Mots-clés : Data & Evidence, Human rights, Innovation, Women & Youth Empowerment

Concertation Indépendante

The Critical Role of Research and Development in Achieving Resilient and Sustainable Food Systems

Cible géographique: Sans cible géographique

Main findings

A review of recent evidence (see links provided at end of report) shows the importance of technical innovation driven by research, development, and extension as drivers of agricultural productivity growth, and further, the catalytic role of agricultural productivity-led growth in poverty reduction, food systems resilience, and economic transformation. Investments in agricultural research and development generate among the greatest impacts on agricultural productivity growth and poverty reduction per dollar spent, though many African governments invest less than 1% of agricultural GDP in agricu... Lire la suiteltural research. Panelists from public and private sector, research, and development communities called for priority actions to ensure sustained support for agricultural research and development. Calls to action include: Demonstrate sustained government commitment for national agricultural Research & Development & Extension (R&D&E) investments, leveraging and building on international donor and CGIAR investments. Increase investments in locally relevant, adaptive national-level agricultural research and development, including the investments in improved institutional and absorptive capacity and ownership at National Agricultural Research Systems (NARS) and improved education for innovation actors, including on-farm actors. Identify opportunities to further strengthen cooperation between national and international research systems and partnerships with the private sector. Prioritize rule of law, governance, and more favorable enabling trade, policy, infrastructure, and security environments to drive productivity growth and support private sector investment. Integrate inclusive, demand-driven, and adaptive agricultural research prioritization and technology development across all agricultural research and development efforts, including social sciences and policy research, ensuring R&D investments reflect choice and actively and meaningfully include smallholder farmers and innovators, women, and youth. Ensure that innovation systems are adaptive to environmental changes and local context. Each of these are further discussed in the next report section. Lire moins

Piste(s) d'Action: 3, 4, 5

Mots-clés : Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Innovation, Policy, Trade-offs, Women & Youth Empowerment

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182