Finlandia - Fase 2
Major focus
This was the main event of the national dialogue in Finland. It is considered as phase 2 dialogue: looking for ideas and innovative solutions for the food system. This time, no regional (subnational) dialogue events were organized: the relatively small country is rather homogeneous in consumption patterns, food markets, farming and natural resources. All five aspects (Action Tracks) were considered and the WGs were divided accordingly. The dialogue webinar was structured as follows: 1. Opening by the top administrator of the two ministries (Min of For. Affairs and Min of Ag&For) and three
... Leer másintroductory speeches: FSS process and the dialogue (Dr David Nabarro), systems approach (Dr Elina Lehikoinen), EU-framework (Director General Minna-Mari Kaila) 2. The meeting was split into five AT working groups, led by top experts from the academia and administration; Introduction by the chair, open input discussion, targeted discussion on 3 to 5 central topics picked up from the discussion by the chair; drafting of the report by the chair and his/her assistant expert). 3. Reporting of the WGs; supplementary comments; synthesis by the curator All five AT-base working groups were given four questions: 1. What are the special stengths of Finland on which future food systems could be built? 2. What kind of (painful) choices we may need to make, when approaching more sustainable food systems and more healthy diets? 3. Are there opportunities or potential solutions, which could provide with an utter change or a giant leap towards sustainable systems? 4. What do we have in our model or in our practices that could serve as an example or a benchmark for the rest of the world? The members of the working groups either spoke to the group or provided answers in the chat column of the video meeting. Chat discussions in the five working groups produced more than 40 pages of ideas/opinions. It was saved and will be analyzed afterwards. A synthesis is made available for all participants, and for the organizing ministries. Chairs of the WGs made a quick compilation of the discussion and crystallized the views expressed in 3 to 5 main points that were discussed further. Upon those discussions, the chairs, together with the nominated expert assistants edited a report for the plenary session of the afternoon. Leer menos
Línea(s) de Acción: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Palabras clave: Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Innovation, Policy, Trade-offs, Women & Youth Empowerment