Explore le compte-rendu officiel des Concertations

The CPLP Member States recognise a lack of progress in reducing hunger and malnutrition in all its forms due to an array of factors which call for a transformation of Food Systems. They also recognise several paths to build resilience, to overcome the driving forces of this situation and help transform Food Systems. Any path requires adequate governance, a multidisciplinary approach and coherent sets of complementary policies and investments, determined within the framework of public institutions created for this purpose, with the participation of all relevant actors. For this reason, a priori... Lire la suitety issue for the transformation of the Food System is the need to reinforce its governance architecture at different territorial levels, with greater coherence in the actions involving its subsystems, i.e., agrifood, environment, health, and social protection at the different levels of political and operational decision-making (local, national, regional, and global). CPLP Food Security and Nutrition Strategy (ESAN-CPLP) framework has already implemented a coherent architecture for the governance of the Food System at the Community level. Lire moins

Territorial approach and governance for the transformation of Food Systems The CPLP Member States recognise a lack of progress in reducing hunger and malnutrition in all its forms due to an array of factors which call for a transformation of Food Systems. They also recognise several paths to build resilience, to overcome the driving forces of this situation and help transform Food Systems. Any path requires adequate governance, a multidisciplinary approach and coherent sets of complementary policies and investments, determined within the framework of public institutions created for this purpos... Lire la suitee, with the participation of all relevant actors. For this reason, a priority issue for the transformation of the Food System is the need to reinforce its governance architecture at different territorial levels, with greater coherence in the actions involving its subsystems, i.e., agrifood, environment, health, and social protection at the different levels of political and operational decision-making (local, national, regional, and global). CPLP Food Security and Nutrition Strategy (ESAN-CPLP) framework has already implemented a coherent architecture for the governance of the Food System at the Community level. In this regard, the CPLP Member States: • Recommend a territorial approach to food systems governance in national policies, programs, and projects related to the five lines of action of the Summit, namely: i) ensuring access to safe and nutritious food for all; ii) shift to sustainable consumption patterns; iii) boost nature positive production; iv) promote equitable livelihoods and build resilience to vulnerabilities, shocks, and stress; • Emphasise the importance of a multi-level architecture for the governance of the Food System, centered on the United Nations Committee on World Food Security (CFS) and on supranational, national, and local platforms articulated within the framework of the decentralisation processes underway in most countries. This inclusive, multi-level, and multi-actor architecture reaching different levels, actors, and spaces can help to strengthen the coordination, coherence, and alignment of policies and programs for more sustainable Food Systems while building trust and security through inclusive solutions; • Promote more significant involvement of local authorities in the construction of local food policies and Food System governance mechanisms, considering the relevant role of cities and the new relationships between urban and rural areas. Lire moins