Explore le compte-rendu officiel des Concertations

Breakout Group 5 Good practices: Multiple examples confirm that a variety of good practices for food system resilience exist at local and national level. These include: - Using science, research and development to provide evidence-backed solutions to the needs of farmers - fostering public-private partnerships to build community resilience through: extension services, digital information solutions, business development, trainings and risk management interventions Challenges: - Environmental and climate considerations are often not incorporated in development projects and interventions - Farmer... Lire la suites should be seen as economic agents, with sound risk-coping strategies and ecosystem services form part of the essential solutions - Disaster response is prioritised over risk reduction Opportunities: Opportunities to build food systems resilience should focus on addressing the root causes of vulnerability, including: - Supporting women as key but vulnerable actors and exposed to different risks in agri-food production - Supporting peacebuilding as an essential component of resilience building - Moving from policy to implementation of comprehensive risk management actions - Bridging funding gaps and boosting absorptive capacities for comprehensive climate and disaster risk management projects/programmes Lire moins

Breakout Group 4 Challenges: - Emphasis on disaster risk management in a multi-risk context: coping with compound disasters and complex emergencies - Using comprehensive risk management to also tackle slow-onset disasters, such as desertification, sea-level rise, drought, etc. - Lack of DRR technical capacities of farmers and communities. - Lack of forums or platforms for discussions and exchanges of good/best practices - Lack of resilient varieties for crop production - Risk management practices do not cover the entire value chain, which poses limitations to farmers when dealing with risk and... Lire la suite disaster impact - Poor land management practices pose a challenge in many Sub-Saharan African countries Opportunities: - COP26 presents a key opportunity for discussion around comprehensive risk management for resilient food systems; farmers need to have a seat at the table during climate discussions - Micro-insurance offers a viable solution for farmers; financial and micro-credit institutions need to be involved in discussions about dealing with risk for building resilient agri-food systems. Lire moins

Breakout Group 3 Good practices: There is a solid foundation of good practices for agricultural risk reduction and food systems resilience, that can be scaled-up and built on. These include: - Timely and reliable Early Warning Systems and dissemination of weather information to farmers - Holistic community-centred approaches that build resilience in a multi-disciplinary way through integrated technical, financial and social interventions - Risk-transfer mechanisms such as crop weather insurance - Multi-actor partnerships for agricultural risk management Challenges: The most notable challenges ... Lire la suitefor building food systems resilience are centred around data, capacity, policy and fragility contexts. Most notably: - Insurance schemes need reliable, granular and timely data on loss and damage at household level, which is not readily available; gender-disaggregated data and geographical coverage present a particular challenge - Farmers lack capacity and need further support to implement disaster and climate risk management practices, environmental conservation, natural resource management techniques, etc. - Fragile contexts with chronic instability are particularly challenging and require tailored approaches for food security and safeguarding agri-food production. Opportunities: - Agroecology and approaches that value natural resources and local knowledge are key opportunities to scale-up food systems resilience - It is important to tackle the root causes of vulnerability to climate and disasters, which are often anthropogenic - Building partnerships and mainstreaming comprehensive climate and disaster risk management into all planning and policy processes, development interventions, NDC and SDG implementation, etc. - Having feedback mechanisms and impact assessments that involve farmers and other supply chain actors and allow for iterative improvements and adjustments of risk management measures. Lire moins

Breakout Group 2 Good practices: Multiple projects and initiatives exist that are already boosting food systems resilience: - Agronomic practices such as greening, crop rotation, agroforestry, etc. - COVID-19 response programmes that target and deliver information to farmers - Communication and awareness campaigns on disaster and climate risk management - Public-private tools such as crop insurance, market observatories, etc. - Integrating risk management in agricultural business planning Challenges: Some of the challenges that cripple risk management for food systems resilience include: - Lac... Lire la suitek of coordination and inclusivity among farmers - Lack of adequate technology, training and financing for risk management - Costs of climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction can be too high for farmers, especially for young farmers; - Shift of mindset to see prevention as an investment not a cost Opportunities: - Investing in knowledge and skills to grow farmers’ policy leverage at national level - Using the potential of the digital and online age to not leave anyone behind - Leveraging on the youth dividend for DRR solutions - Employing risk management practices to improve market stability - Acknowledging farmers’ central and active role in co-building resilient and sustainable food value chains Lire moins

Breakout Group 1 Good practices: There is a wealth of risk management, prevention, mitigation and reduction practices employed at farm, food value chain, local, country or regional level. Some examples are: - providing fortification of seed varieties - promoting diversification of livelihoods, agroforestry and value addition for better returns on investment - promoting consumer awareness for sustainable and climate-neutral production - targeting rural women - promoting natural infrastructure that conserves and enhances ecosystem functions Challenges: Food systems resilience is challenged by mu... Lire la suiteltiple factors: - resource constraints for targeted action - lack of dedicated policies - an overall gap in the understanding of risk along the food value chains and entire food system. - lack of functional safety nets or dedicated schemes such as climate insurance, land management practices or risk proofing of infrastructure - farmers’ risk-aversion Opportunities: There is a unique opportunity for the Food Systems Summit outcomes to be translated into practical actions. What is needed to strengthen food systems resilience is a package of actions that include: - scaling-up insurance, mentorship and longer-term engagement with farmers - promoting consumer awareness on safe, fair, climate friendly, nature positive and healthy food - risk-proofing of agricultural production and value chains - policy is paramount: need to improve local-level policy making and integrate it at the national, regional and global level - legislative measures are needed to promote human rights and environmental due diligence - engaging with the private sector to tackle risks in food systems - using climate funding to build a comprehensive risk management approach Lire moins

Overarching key messages of the Dialogue: 1. There is a widely-recognised need to better understand multi-hazard, complex and cascading risks in agri-food systems and adopt integrated and multidisciplinary approaches centered on the shift from crisis and disaster management to risk management for resilience. 2. We need to recognise risk prevention as an investment, not a cost. 3. A multi-hazard, comprehensive risk management approach is essential to tackle the mutually reinforcing impact of climate change and disasters on agricultural production and food value chains 4. Today, a suite of farme... Lire la suiter-driven good practices and tools are available for comprehensive risk management in agri-food systems. Actors committed to building resilient agri-food systems need a shared narrative on resilience building in order to connect these risk management measures and build on synergies and complementarity by forging partnerships and collaborations on for example: risk monitoring and actionable early warnings, risk governance and capacity building, risk transfer (insurance and social protection), nature-based solutions, risk proofing of infrastructure, emergency preparedness, anticipatory action and response, etc . Specific messages from opening panelists: Sandrine Dixson-Declève - Co-Chair UN Food System Summit Resilience Action Track 5 and Co-President Club of Rome: Interconnected global crises are unfolding and we need to craft the mechanisms that need to be in place to deal with all these different emergencies. These are planetary emergencies and need to be addressed through risk management lens for resilience building, in line with the Paris Agreement, the Convention on biodiversity, the Sendai Framework, integrating all elements of the agriculture food value chain, from producers to consumers and for the overall achievement of the 2030 agenda. Mami Mizutori - Special Representative of the Secretary General for Disaster Risk Reduction and Head of UNDRR A thorough understanding of the contemporary risk landscape is key. Risks are interconnected, cascading, not linear and long lasting. We therefore need to transition from siloed approaches to risk management towards new, innovative multi-hazard, multi-disciplinary and multi-sector innovative risk management interventions. We need a paradigm shift, from managing disasters to managing disaster risk, through comprehensive risk management. Building resilience is also about identifying the most vulnerable, giving them a voice in the making and implementing of strategies for DRR. Communities need to be given a central role, through a whole-of-society approach. Arianna Giuliodori - Secretary General, World Farmers’ Organisation Farmers are resilient by nature. Their risk-coping strategies, ecosystem services and economic agency must be seen as part of the solution. In order to boost farmers’ pivotal economic, environmental and social role, partnerships are a game-changer. Rein Paulsen – Director, Office of Emergencies and Resilience, FAO The latest analyses from FAO and others signal a deeply concerning global rise in acute and chronic hunger and malnutrition. The convergence in our messages here today illustrate that this is an urgent issue which needs a transition from responding to crisis to managing risk, from crisis response to multiple risk management. We urgently need a shared understanding of the risk around us. We also need to recognise there is no magic bullet, but the need to bring together preventive, anticipatory action; we need to be able to absorb and adapt, as well as to transform agriculture and food systems, all essential for resilience building. Romina Cavatassi – Lead Economist and Head of Impact Assessment, IFAD Finance can be mobilized to support transformation by redirecting capital into a circular economy, moving beyond agriculture into a system approach that can include the whole food system and invest in environmentally sustainable models of agriculture and food systems. Integrating risks and building resilient food systems implies (i) coordination, (ii) innovation in blended finance and private sector involvement, (iii) include and expand CSO to guarantee ownership and sustainability over time; and (iv) incentives such as paying ecosystem services, loans with environmental conditions, insurance connected to environmental management. Vulnerabilities are higher for people that are often marginalised; therefore, transformation should ensure inclusion, putting nutrition at the center of transformation pathways. Terry Otieno – Youth Secretary, Kenya Red Cross Society and Global Focal Point, UN Major Group for Children and Youth 16-18% of the population of the world is youth and holds a unique potential to boost food systems transformation. An empowered youth can support resilient agri-food systems. The youth holds the key to transformative innovations for food systems resilience, including technological, policy, and cultural innovations. Breakout Groups: Six breakout groups discussed and shared their views around three same questions around main actions needed to build food system resilience. Acknowledging that we are not starting from scratch, the groups took stock of existing good practices as well as the challenges and opportunities to manage multiple risks along the food system. Below are the key takeaways from the lively discussion and summary made by each group. Lire moins

The main focus of this Independent Dialogue was on the Action Track 5 on Resilience. An array of familiar and unfamiliar risks deriving from vulnerabilities, shocks and stresses are jeopardizing food systems and forcing millions to face hunger and acute food insecurity. Global crises such as COVID-19, the climate emergency, pollution, biodiversity loss and conflict are aggravating food insecurity and posing an existential threat to both humans and ecosystems alike. They starkly demonstrate the systemic nature of risk and the need for comprehensive risk management for strengthening resilience a... Lire la suitecross systems, and especially for agri-food systems. Food systems are particularly vulnerable and at risk from various shocks (disasters, crisis or conflicts) and stresses (slower and often less visible threats or changes) with grave consequences, as the unfolding climate crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic are starkly demonstrating. When food systems fail, millions of people bear the consequences in terms of food insecurity, malnutrition, hunger, disruptions of value chains and livelihoods, with cascading impacts on health, education and the economy but also human rights, peace and security. Systemic risk threatens all pillars of sustainable development – social, environmental and economic – and hampers global progress towards achieving Agenda 2030. The UN Food Systems Summit - through its Action Track 5 on Resilience - offers a timely opportunity to focus on the multiple risks, crisis and fragilities underpinning food systems and to regenerate and transform these systems in order to better respond to the growing needs of people and ecosystems. To this end, comprehensive climate and disaster risk management is a critical means to making food systems – and agri-food production in particular – more resilient. Risk reduction can protect development investments in agriculture (including crops, livestock, fisheries, aquaculture and forestry), as well as markets and transportation, ecosystems, consumption and nutrition as well as child and maternal health. From production to consumption and disposal, the sectors and systems that support and connect food systems and food security are highly integrated. If risks at producer-level are not effectively managed, this can have cascading effects across all components of the food value chain, potentially leading to overall food system failures. Adopting a comprehensive risk management approach, including for climate resilience and a green COVID-19 recovery process, would deliver healthier, more resilient, inclusive and sustainable agri-food systems. Comprehensive risk management therefore plays a vital role for ensuring one of the basic human rights – the right to food, freedom from hunger and access and availability of healthy and nutritious and balanced diets. The Independent Dialogue convened by the UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), the World Farmers’ Organisation (WFO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) offered a unique opportunity to come up with concrete solutions and urgent transformative actions to mainstream comprehensive risk management approaches for resilient agri-food systems, which, in turn are vital for achieving the 17 SDGs and the targets of the Sendai Framework. More specifically, the Dialogue sought to unpack the systemic nature of risk in relation to food systems and encourage innovative thinking in identifying, managing and preventing the complexity of multiple and often cascading risks and crisis that threaten and affect the resilience of food value chains. Discussions centred on the intersections between disaster risk management and climate change adaptation in the agricultural sectors as a key solution towards disaster and climate-resilient and sustainable food systems, with farmers and youth at the centre of transformative action. Lire moins

While there was some differences of opinion on what aspects to prioritise to scale up sustainable food cold chains, there were no major divergences as regards the challenges, ways to address them, and possible ways forward to make sustainable food cold chains happen for all.

• Sustainable cold chain is critical for ensuring food safety and security, reducing food waste and loss, mitigating climate change and preventing the depletion of the ozone layer. • Further development of policies, strategies, plans and actions for sustainable cold chain needs: -robust systems-level thinking; - to enable logistics connectivity from farm to fork -needs-driven integrated approaches; -multistakeholder, multi-sectoral coordination; -cross-sectoral decision-making mechanisms; -collaboration at all stages of the sustainable cold chain development and implementation, including w... Lire la suiteithin the research community and through formal cross-sectoral coordination mechanisms within governments; and development partners, including the donor community; -robust data and sound comprehensive (including financial, economic, environmental, social and gender aspects) cost-benefit assessment are key to de-risk and optimize investments in sustainable cold chains • The Rome Declaration under the Montreal Protocol on “the Contribution of the Montreal Protocol to Food Loss Reduction through Sustainable Cold Chain Development” is an important platform for political commitments and actions for states and other stakeholders. Parties to the Montreal Protocol are encouraged to sign on to it if they have not yet done so. • The commitment to deliver on sustainable food systems transformation and sustainable cold chain solutions can help countries also deliver on the Kigali Amendment, the Paris Agreement and the SDGs. • Energy-efficient ozone and other climate-friendly technologies powered by renewable energy and integrated approaches and game-changing solutions approaches are needed for sustainable cold chain development. • Foster knowledge exchange at all levels, collection and dissemination of information and awareness raising on available and feasible solutions for developing sustainable cold chains are important. Initiatives such as the sustainable cold chain virtual exhibition, Global Food Cold Chain Status report, and further dialogues such as are useful tools in this regard. • Awareness raising required on a systems approach and multiple benefits of effective and sustainable food cold-chain • Technical assistance, capacity building and training required on use of cold-chain systems and low-GWP technology including deployment, operation and maintenance but also on logistics of an effective cold-chain • The synergetic benefits of sustainable cold chains to both the food and health sectors should be given due consideration in prioritising development programmes, in particular those related to post-pandemic response. Lire moins

A total of 20 organizations (from governments, farmer and industrial associations and international organizations) made contributions to the dialogue. They first discussed challenges related to the cold chain for food (and also vaccines) which demonstrated various facets of cold chains in the area of food and healthcare. The following key challenges in scaling up sustainable cold chain solutions in a meaningful way are as follows: 1) Poor awareness of food cold chains benefits among food chain and cooling sector actors at international and national level; 2) Access to cold chain is uneve... Lire la suiten both within countries and between developed and developing countries 3) A siloed approach to cooling and cold-chain development, resulting in a sub-optimal outcome, e.g. insufficient consideration to the close linkages between access to cooling and cold-chain services and access to sustainable, reliable and affordable energy; e.g. efficiency of sub-system instead of effectiveness of the entire system 4) Insufficient consideration to the multi-dimensional character of food cold chains development, resulting in benefits from food cold chains being available in a fragmented manner, e.g. the lack of coordination between the food and health sectors regarding the possibility to combine cooling action benefits ‘from farm to fork’ with those from “vaccine manufacturer to arm”. 5) Transition to from outdated and polluting existing technologies to ozone and climate friendly cold and energy efficient chain technologies due to the operational and commercial limitations of current more sustainable refrigerant options, insufficient skilled technicians in developing countries, underdeveloped or weakly implemented standards and regulations for safety and energy efficiency 6)Other identified challenges include paucity of robust evidenced based data and forecasts on impacts of food cold-chain, limited, research funding; 7) Projected growing project demand for more cold chains driven by the various factors which compounds these challenges but also present an opportunity. In the second part of the dialogue, the panelists presented various initiatives as scalable solutions for cold chains in the food sector and beyond. These included: -Overview of available more sustainable technologies (e.g. by Global Food Cold Chain Council, industries in EU and China), -Database model for cold chains to understand the cold chain extent in developing countries and to identify opportunities for expansion of cold chain benefits (e.g. by Bahrain and Paraguay with support of OzonAction), -Enabling strategies and policies to ensure better coordination and integrated approaches to cooling and cold chains for compliance with the MEAs (Montreal Protocol and Paris Agreement), agricultural development and achieving SDGs (e.g. India and EU) -Cooling for all needs assessments and National Cooling Action Plans (e.g India) -The Africa Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Cooling and Cold-Chain (Rwanda); -Best practices and lessons learned from projects on already available energy-efficient, low-global warming potential and ozone-friendly cold chains technologies and capacity building activities in specific sectors, i.e. supermarkets, including the role and instruments existing multilateral financial mechanisms to promote these solutions (UNIDO, AREA) -The role of the cold chain in health care ensuring more equitable and efficient roll of vaccinations programmes -Summary for policy-makers from case studies and status assessment on cold chains (Cool Coalition, CCAC,FAO, Ozone Secretariat, UNEP OzonAction). Participants agreed that sustainable cold-chains are key for improving human well-being, boosting economic growth and delivering socio-economic development through the SDGs, while simultaneously achieving the climate change targets of the Paris Agreement and Kigali Amendment to Montreal Protocol. Lire moins

The event aimed at highlighting the key role of sustainable food cold chains in ensuring food safety and security, reducing food waste and loss, mitigating and adapting to climate change preventing the depletion of the ozone layer. As such it related to several Action Tracks – AT1/ ensure access to safe and nutritious food for all; AT2/, shift to sustainable consumption patterns, and AT5/ 5 build resilience to vulnerabilities, shocks and stress - as well to the newly defined Action Areas of the UNFSS, in particular AA1/Nourish All People; and AA4/Build Resilience to Vulnerabilities, Shocks a... Lire la suitend Stresses. Another objective of the event was to demonstrate how the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, universally ratified multilateral environmental agreement, its Kigali Amendment, and its Rome Declaration on Sustainable Cold Chain Development can contribute to mobilizing and scaling up solutions for delivering sustainable cold chains. The Rome Declaration aims to foster exchange of information and strengthening cooperation and coordination among governments and other stakeholders in the area of the cold chain and the contribution of the cold to SDGs, and the Dialogue contributed significantly towards this objective. Lire moins

There was no overt "conflict", but it is worth noting that one of the challenges faced by Breastfeeding advocates is the conflict of business sector interest, specifically of companies producing breast milk substitutes (BMS), with that of common good. Aid from BMS companies inevitably promotes BMS products that usually undermines the efforts of breastfeeding advocates to empower and equip women to continue breastfeeding even during emergency situations. The business sector expressed that they have been very active and involved in mitigating the impact of the pandemic on vulnerable groups but t... Lire la suitehere is merit in considering how the BMS distributed, or at least the promotion of the brand, could discourage lactation or uplift the image of BMS over breastmilk. There was no further comment from the business sector on how they plan to align their efforts with the World Health Assembly targets on promoting exclusive breastfeeding for optimum child growth. Lire moins

Participants from various stakeholder groups expressed how they perceive the government could support and complement their local efforts to build resilience. These are summarized into five key functions: 1. Consolidate, coordinate and scale up good practices Participants deem it necessary to strengthen partnership with the government for additional support and guidance on their effort to build their resilience against food system shocks and stressors. They consider the government able and appropriate to harmonize and unify the various information management systems so that it is readily availa... Lire la suiteble at all levels (local, region, national). The delegates also think it is the role of the government to coordinate the efforts of various organizations working on specific target groups to unify and synergize interventions and prioritize the most vulnerable and reach far flung areas. One example of this is the partnership of LATCH Los Baños with the Provincial Government of Laguna and UPLB to establish community-engaged Human Milk Banks and to mobilize communities to prepare for and handle IYCF during emergencies. The government is seen as the appropriate institution to establish a platform for effective partnerships to facilitate institutionalization and scaling up of best practices for food system sustainability. There are already many good innovations, systems, and practices being done in the communities and local markets; they just need to be scaled up. 2. Policy and governance There are a lot of food system drivers that are beyond the control or influence of civil society stakeholders but under the authority of the government. For example, land conversion could be prudently managed through appropriate local government resolutions on land use. Trade and pricing policies hugely affect consumers and food producers, especially when supply of cheap imported alternatives becomes greater than local produce. Participants expressed hope for the government to control the prices of commodities and monitor fake imported products in favor of the consumers and local food producers. Relevant to the role of the government on scaling up resilience-building strategies, breastfeeding advocates expressed their request for the government to issue a policy on institutionalization of mother support groups in the communities like the policy on ensuring availability of community health and nutrition workers in every barangay. 3. Increase government investment Various civil society stakeholders also call for increased government investment on health and nutrition services, extension services, and personnel. They think it is appropriate for the government to invest in having “Agriculturist to the Barrios” – agriculture extension workers for every community, especially in last-mile areas. 4. Provision of Inputs, Infrastructure & Capacity Building activities The delegates perceive the government having a big role in providing essential agricultural infrastructure such as mini-dams, tractors and other heavy equipment. Specifically, they see the LGUs as key actors who can refer farmers in need of government support to national agriculture agencies if only they have a systematic profile of farmers in their municipality or city. This could also help in effective and efficient monitoring of aid given. The delegates also expressed the need to tap government agencies such as the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), Science and Technology (DOST), and Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA) to provide training for livelihoods and financial literacy among farmers and other vulnerable groups. 5. Accountability and transparency Last but not the least, the delegates clamor for accountability and transparency in our governments decisions and actions relevant to our food systems. Lire moins

The participants mentioned a lot of food system shocks and stresses they experienced in recent years but they were able to develop adaptation and mitigation innovations to build their resilience. Climate change-related food system shocks & stresses usually damage the participants' livelihoods and assets and hampers transport of their produce, leading to fluctuations in price and supply of inputs and commodities. They adapted through the following: ●Adoption of Climate-smart agriculture and aquaculture practices such as: ○Planting windbreak trees ○Livelihood diversification with low a... Lire la suitend high-value aquafarming products and climate-resilient crops (like root & tuber crops) ○Installation of seawater exit canals towards the greater open water to let the algae (causing red tide) out of the fishing and aquaculture zones ○Mulching and raised planting beds ○Mangrove and forest rehabilitation ○Use of organic fertilizer and pesticides ●Installation of drainage slots and mini-dam or mini-impounding to control excess rain water and serve as water source during drought ●Development of climate change mitigation plans ●Accessing credit/loans from COMSCA groups ●Establishment of community vermiculture and composting facilities ●Organizing community members into support groups, farmer learning groups, or environmental stewards’ group ●Propagation and consumption of climate-resilient indigenous vegetables ●Selling of high-value aquaculture products to local consumers (albeit at a lower cost than export price) The COVID-19 pandemic also affected our local food systems such as disruption in supply chains, closure of businesses resulting in unemployment, hampered school, health service, and research operations, limited food access due to quarantine protocols, etc. The participants adapted by: ●Promoting and setting up community and backyard/home food gardening and promoting local vegetables for better food access amidst emergency situations and rapid urbanization ●Offering free online trainings/webinars and disseminating information materials on nutrition, livelihood activities, entrepreneurship, agripreneurship, breastfeeding, misconceptions about indigenous foods ●Setting up community pantries, or mobilizing local resources from general public to raise and distribute locally sourced fresh produce, health & nutrition information and food gardening materials ●Joining and inviting others into COMSCA or microfinance groups to access low-interest credit ●Collecting and re-distributing/donating excess food to impoverished communities ●Offering trainings on post-harvest processing technologies to reduce food waste ●Direct purchasing from farmers and fisherfolks through online platforms to help bridge the food supply chain gaps brought by the travel restrictions and market closures ●Setting up of human milk community depots: milk-sharing for infants needing breast milk supplementation and counselling for recipient families ●Follow evidence-based Maternal & IYCF practices during emergencies ●Meal planning and bulk buying for efficient and easy food preparation ●Transitioning research data collection activities into digital platforms ●Conducted corporate social responsibility activities during the pandemic Representatives of women and mothers’ support groups also raised concerns on human-induced stresses on the “First Food System” – breastfeeding. According to them, business/commercial interests affected nutrition messages. They took the following steps to protect and promote the right of mother and infants to breastfeeding amidst the pandemic and other emergency situations: ●Develop implementing guidelines to uphold adequate nutrition in the First 1000 days ●Strengthen community support and empower families and women on breastfeeding ●Conduct breast milk donation drive ●Network with mother support groups for re-distribution of donated human milk Some participants also voiced that they perform watchdog roles such as informing the local government on welfare status of communities and exposing corruption and demanding accountability from public officials to contribute in alleviating food system stresses caused by corruption and political issues. Lire moins

Despite being in varying sectors, the commitments of the delegates fell under the following similar tracks: I. Train others to scale out resilience-building strategies and innovations: A. Climate-Smart Agriculture/Aquaculture (CSA) Delegates committed to scale out in their communities their innovations to adapt to climate change and COVID-19 impacts on our food systems. 1-Basiao Oyster and Mussel Fisherfolks Association (BOFA) committed to continue training other fisherfolks on the Raft Method - a climate-smart way of growing oysters. Samahang Magsasaka ng Barangay San Pedro 1, Sikap Coffee, Y... Lire la suiteakap at Halik Multi-Purpose Cooperative (YHMPC), and farmer-scientist Mr. Ed Silan also expressed their commitment to train fellow farmers on CSA practices such as crop and livestock diversification, rainwater collection, organic farming, and to keep their farms open for benchmarking visits. Sikap Coffee will continue facilitating learning exchanges with coffee farmers on new technologies for post-harvest processing of coffee. B. Community Savings and Credit Associations (COMSCA) COMSCA membership helped grassroots stakeholders develop financial resilience. It gives them access to loans to expand their livelihoods or recover from asset loss. The members of Samahang Magsasaka ng Barangay San Pedro 1 and the Barangay United Loans and Savings Association (BULSA) committed to invite more community members to join their COMSCA groups. Currently, BULSA members are mostly women but they expressed intent to invite men and youth as well. C. Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) EBF is a healthy and sustainable practice within the food system. Support groups like Breastfeeding Bicolanas, LATCH Los Baños, and Breastfeeding Care Center of the North (BCCN) commit to continue capacity-building activities and online learning-sharing exchanges among mothers on lactation and/or re-lactation practices. LATCH Los Baños is securing a long-term partnership with the Provincial Government of Laguna and the University of the Philippines-Los Baños (UPLB) to jointly implement Project BREAST (Breastfeeding as Response to Emergencies made more Accessible through Science and Technology) to jumpstart emergency-Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices (IYCF). They will conduct a province-wide training and re-training of community nutrition and health workers on proper IYCF during emergencies, including strengthening the local Human Milk bank they have established in Los Baños. II. Continue advocacy and awareness raising efforts on sustainable food production and consumption practices Youth organizations such as Slow Food Youth Network Philippines, Girl Scouts of the Philippines (GSP), OurND, and Masagana EcoFarms committed to continue efforts to promote and raise awareness on good nutrition habits, agrobiodiversity conservation, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and awareness and understanding of our Food Systems. They plan to do so via social media campaigns, podcasts, personalized dietary counselling, mainstreaming locally-available vegetables in menus offered, and other platforms. The commitment of GSP to raise awareness on Food Systems somehow matches the expressed need of some of the participants from the women and mother support groups – they hope there is a “one-stop shop” or repository where they can learn more about Food Systems and access relevant local-level data. The youth representatives from the Philippine Association of Nutrition & 4H Club committed to promote availment of needs-based health and nutrition extension services, and agro-entrepreneurship trainings offered by local governments, respectively. III. Conserve and propagate climate-resilient, local crops Women and farmer groups like First Pirico Farmer’s Association (FPFA), BULSA, YHMPC, and Farmer Scientists all expressed commitment to conserve and propagate climate-resilient, local crops by establishing community seed banks or Crop Museums in partnership with local governments, state colleges and universities, and NGOs. A Crop Museum is a decentralized nursery of climate-smart and nutrient-dense local vegetables that also serves as a learning hub for agrobiodiversity conservation. IV. Partnership building and collaboration with local government agencies and other organizations Almost all participating groups expressed they will explore and strengthen partnership with local governments and organizations to scale out their adaptation strategies. FPFA and the farmer COMSCA Group from Kidapawan, North Cotabato committed to partner with a local cooperative and the Office of Municipal Agriculturist (OMA) to expand their vegetable home gardening and tree planting activities. Samahang Magsasaka ng Barangay San Pedro 1 will partner with OMA to raise more resources for their community-shared facilities for raising native pigs while Modern Nanays of Mindanao commits to pursue its initial discussions with ThinkWell Institute about convening the various breastfeeding support groups in the Philippines. The Youth group announced plans to formally organize the dialogue’s youth delegates into a network of youth advocates for nutrition and sustainable food systems. They boldly called for other stakeholder groups who want to partner with them and support their committed actions. A few youth groups also committed to continue efforts to reduce food waste by collecting aesthetically rejected fresh produce and using it for community pantries and soup kitchens. BCCN also committed to continue serving as a watchdog to uphold the breastfeeding rights of women and children. Lire moins

The Dialogue was designed to catalyze discussion on how to build food systems resilience specifically against climate change and COVID-19-related stressors and shocks. Nonetheless, we also documented disruptions of other nature voiced out by the participants. The following are the top stressors and shocks frequently brought up across the different stakeholder groups, arranged from the most frequently mentioned: 1. Strong Typhoons 2. Disruptions in inputs and market supply due to COVID-19 related travel ban 1.1. Unemployment and business/operations shutdowns resulting from various COVID-19-rela... Lire la suiteted restrictions 1.2. Increased availability of highly processed foods from food aid and local markets (including and breastmilk substitutes from food donations) 1.3. Insufficient post-harvest storage and transportation facilities 1.4. Food insecurity brought by Covid-19 1.5. Insufficient supply of breastmilk for babies in key places like hospitals 1.6. Climate change affecting food production 4.1. Flooding 4.2. Landslide 4.3. Drought 4.4. Market sale and inputs price surges 4.5. Soil erosion and degradation resulting from unsustainable farming practices 4.6. Landlessness 4.7. Land conversion 4.8. Poverty Delegates from various parts of the country reckon experiencing more and increasingly stronger typhoons. They expressed that it destroys crops and livelihoods, undermining their efforts to produce and sell food, as well as community food production efforts like school gardening. It also impedes the transport of goods from one place to another. Along with degradation of natural resources, typhoons also damage fish breeding grounds through increased siltation. Participants also said that the COVID-19 community quarantine protocols disrupted supply chains. This exacerbated fluctuations in prices of inputs and commodities, especially fresh, perishable foods. As prices of goods increased, the purchasing power and access of consumers, especially for nutritious food, decreased due to sales losses, closure of businesses, and increased unemployment also resulting from the COVID-19 restrictions. Together with increased availability of highly processed foods and breastmilk substitutes from food aid and local markets, vulnerable groups are pushed further towards unhealthy and unsustainable consumption. Service delivery, research and humanitarian implementation were also hampered. All of these compounded and led to more people suffering from food insecurity, worsening health and nutrition status. Other food system stressors and shocks mentioned, although less prominently, include: I. Geophysical/meteorological ● Changes in seasonal patterns ● Red tide ● Taal Volcano eruption ● Loss of agricultural livelihoods II. Human-induced ● Disruption in research and data collection ● Separation of mother to infant due to confusing COVID-19 health protocols ● Marine habitat destruction ● Natural resource degradation ● Overfishing ● Conflict of business sector interest with breastfeeding promotion ● Change in socio-political leaders ● Trade policies favorable to influx of cheaper, imported food products (specifically coffee) ● Massive corruption ● Urbanization ● Spread of misinformation in social media; insufficient knowledge of general populace on food, nutrition, and sustainability ● Weak local government support on nutrition and agricultural needs (e.g., breastfeeding promotion and mainstreaming, farmers’ needs) ● Social discrimination (e.g., marginalization of farmers from market actors like middlemen, unequal access of women agricultural entrepreneurs to loans) ● Armed conflict ● Insufficient Irrigation infrastructure ● Consumer preference for imported vegetables III. Biological ● African Swine Flu Lire moins

Clima y Biodiversidad Si no respectamos la naturaleza nos vemos afectados en el cambio climático Susana La fiscalización económica, a la hora de observar los indicadores se determina que no hay equidad e igualdad. Tamara Quiroz Guzmán cd. Delicias Chihuahua – México Clima y biodiversidad: Existen muchos monocultivos, introducción de especies exóticas y aprovechamiento de especies sin llegar a ser sostenible Producir alimentos o productos de necesidad básica, para las personas de manera más eficiente tomando en cuenta los recursos naturales sin llegar a dañar el ambiente Columba Mar... Lire la suitetínez Hernández Ixtlán de Juárez Oaxaca México Lire moins

Ajuste a Principio 13 Participación activa Falta incluir instituciones de investigación y educativas. Ajuste Areas de Convergencia y/o Divergencia Nutrir a la gente (Nutrición Poblacional) Fomentar el rescate gastronómico cultural. Ajuste al Tema Principal Promover el consumo local mediante cursos y/o capacitación, etc. el consumo de productos naturales, resaltando el aporte nutricional Columba Martínez Hernández Ixtlán de Juárez Oaxaca México José Guillermo Almodovar Alvarado Durango – México John Alfonso Merino Yañac Lima Perú Bruno Fidel Carrasco Andrade Canton La Libertad P... Lire la suiterov. Sta Elena – Ecuador Maria Teresa Huarcaya Lima – Perú Javier Bulnes Luque Cartagena España y México Marcela Vizcarra Maella Tacna – Perú Cyndi Paredes Peña Tacna – Perú Christiam Copaja Choque Tacna – Perú Alfonso Navarro Carvallo Tacna – Perú y Chile Lire moins

Aquellos que piensan que no tienen tiempo para tiempo para una alimentación saludable tarde o temprano encontraron tiempo para la enfermedad. Obrar responsable y sostenible, Alimentación y Nutrición Asegurada. Cuidar las cuencas en las zonas altas permite tener agua y mejorar la parte política en la legislación (ODS13) Acción por clima, (ODS16) Paz, Justicia e Instituciones Sólidas (ODS17) Alianzas para lograr los Objetivos. Antonio Apoyar a los pequeños agricultores, para que generen diversidad de alimentos, considerando el clima, los suelos y el agua; y así reducir el hambre en la p... Lire la suiteoblación más pobre. (ODS 1) Fin de la Pobreza, (ODS 2) Hambre Cero, (ODS 12) Producción y Consumo Responsables. Capacitar a las personas, instituciones y gobierno alineados al (ODS 4) Educación de calidad. Una ciudad sostenible y resiliente para tener una buena productividad en un sistema alimentario y más agua para todos (ODS6) Agua Limpia y Saneamiento, (ODS8) Trabajo decente y crecimiento económico ODS11 (Ciudades y Comunidades Sostenibles). Tamara Quiroz Guzmán cd. Delicias Chihuahua – México Concientizar a la gente sobre la importancia de la nutrición alimentaria para el bienestar social y personal, de acuerdo a la gastronomía local y productos libres de químicos, de manera sostenible. (ODS9) Industria Innovación e Infraestructura (ODS3) Salud y bienestar (ODS2) Hambre Cero Columba Martínez Hernández Ixtlán de Juárez Oaxaca México Construcción de sistemas alimentarios saludables y sostenibles que respecten los limites biofísicos de los sistemas socioecológicos locales, que sustenten la soberanía alimentaria que conserven la biodiversidad a través de prácticas agroecológicas, y valoren los distintos saberes. Andrea Venegas Sandoval Chiapas - México El mundo es un nuevo futuro, un nuevo comienzo, el cual nosotros creamos. Somos una sociedad la cuál es efímeramente constante en los que nos propongamos, no dejemos que nuestras emociones nos consuman. ODS 1 ODS 8 y ODS 13 Fabián Romero Flores Tacna – Perú Como gobierno, dedicar gran parte del presupuesto nacional a la agroindustria regional y nacional; en síntesis, generar autosuficiencia agrícola. ODS 8 ODS 12 y ODS 17. Juan Diego Guillén Velásquez. Tacna – Perú El impulso a la educación ambiental, permite una agricultura sana, trabajo decente, reducción de contaminación y contribuye a un desarrollo económico y sostenible. ODS12 ODS8 ODS11 ODS13 Fabiola Iveth Ortega Montes Delicias, Chihuahua - México Con contratos de compra venta a productores se garantizan los precios justos Luisa Patricia Uranga Valencia Delicias Chihuahua – México Con una buena educación y el cuidado de la naturaleza se mejorara la nutrición de la población ODS2 ODS3 ODS15 Rocio Erika Bahamondes Pino Lire moins

El ODS2 HAMBRE CERO se enfoca en los 3 pilares donde se interconecta o enfoca con los demás objetivos. Estamos en una Emergencia Climática Global, donde en todos los Países se ven afectados. 2.4 Asegurar la sostenibilidad de los sistemas de producción de alimentos y aplicar prácticas agrícolas resilientes. 2.4.1 Agricultura productiva y Sostenible 2.a Aumentar la cooperación Internacional 2.a.1 Gasto Publico Capacitar a las personas, instituciones y gobierno alineados al (ODS 4) Educación de calidad. 4.7 Conocimientos Teóricos y Prácticos para promover el desarrollo sostenible. 4.7.1... Lire la suite La educación para la ciudadanía y la educación para el desarrollo sostenible Producción y consumo que no afecte al medio ambiente. (ODS13) Acción por el Clima 13.3 Mejorar la educación, la sensibilización y la capacidad humana e institucional a la mitigación, adaptación y como nuevo la adaptación transformativa. 13.1.2 Numero de países que han comunicado una mayor creación de capacidad institucional e individual Fortalecer la vinculación con las autoridades, gobierno, universidades, diferentes instituciones alineado al (ODS 17) Alianzas para lograr los Objetivos. 17.16 Mejorar la cooperación regional e internacional Norte- Sur, Sur-Sur y triangular en materia de ciencia, tecnología e innovación y el acceso a estos y aumentar el intercambio de conocimientos 17.16.1 Numero de acuerdos y programas de cooperación en materia de ciencia o tecnología. ODS 15 Vida de Ecosistemas terrestres, opino que es muy necesario este ODS para la mejora de la vida humana, es tanto el daño que estamos creando hacia los animales por simple egoísmo de nuestra parte, y no vemos que los animales y los ecosistemas son parte fundamental del balance del mundo, pues con ellos logramos tener una vida más equilibrada y mejor, llevándonos a la paz y vida digna que tanto buscamos. María Fernanda Olivas Guerrero Cd. Delicias Chihuahua – México Promover una educación ambiental basada en la empatía y fundamentada en valores. Valorar el trabajo de los/las campesino(as). Andrea Venegas Sandoval Chiapas - México Capacitación social. Al tener capacitación social recurrimos a una empatía con el receptor, el cual tendrá una inclusión en su familia, en su dichosa estadía familiar, el capacitado, capacitará a su familia, incluyendo a su hijo, el cual funcionará como un soporte para el futuro social, esto me lleva al ODS, “acción por el clima”, cuando el progenitor esté capacitado, implementará sus propios ideales en la sociedad, creando cambios los cuales serán muy sustentables a lo largo de los años, creará ideas las cuales cambiaran el rumbo de nuestra naturaleza, realizando acciones que nos ayudarán a mejorar nuestra sociedad climática. Fabián Romero Flores Tacna – Perú Lire moins