Официальная обратная связь диалогов

• Local government (i.e., Beilun District, Ningbo City, China) will find guidebook launched in the dialogue a helpful tool to help advance WET market transformation. o Through dialogue, together with EAT Foundation, the policy boot camp developed by Dr Nazia Mintz Habib would like to provide research tools for Beilun Bureau of Health on policy systems reform. The boot camp is expected to propose transformation plans fit for Beilun wet markets.

• Recognize uniqueness of challenges faced by each market o Gentrification follows as economic develops at a rapidat rapid rate in cities in China. City planners should be aware that food can promote gentrification in certain way. Thus, food price and access to healthy food should be ensured in every community, especially in those vulnerable groups (eg. low-income groups).

• Adaptation o Market management: the value of a WET market should be widely recognized by vendors, local government officers, consumers and market management team. One innovative idea is to utilize night market as places where the youth can learn how to cook, where to find food that tastes good, and where to incubate future livelihoods. This considers time constraints and busy schedules of young people living in urban areas in China. o Consumption behavior: It is emphasized that consumption habit can be guided and adapted to a more sustainable way. One solution proposed is to involve chefs ... Подробнееin the transformation. Chefs, especially celebrity chefs, can help promote a plant-based diet while guiding young consumers to re-appreciate food from production to consumption end. Скрыть

• Adaptation on market management and a shift on consumption behavior (through education) among young people are equally vital. • Inspiring ideas along with worldwide best practices should be collected in guidebook and introduced to practitioners in China.

• Identify the value and challenges for wet markets in China • Analyze problems of current interventions • Explore the trend of development of markets • Propose effective strategies to revitalize wet markets in China

The practice of "mercy release" by Buddhists has a more obvious faith based background, and the key audience may be limited to faith groups and individuals. When communicating with the public, it is easy to form a stereotype of "veganism in connection to faith". Faith based communities are vegetarians. It is possible, however, to achieve more cooperative and innovative ideas in terms of advocacy.

1. How do faith based communities contribute to healthy and sustainable food transformation? In the 2020’s, faith based communities can make contributions in the following ways: - Share wisdoms of faiths and provide the public with alternative options. - Utilize traditional wisdoms of faiths practical ways so that they can be easily practiced and used to meet daily challenges. - Continue to advocate for plant based diet as an alternative to the practice of mercy release, which has environment consequences; these purchases in such high quantities still support the local factory farms thus not... Подробнее solving the issue at its root. - Inspire members of the faith based community into practices of healthy and sustainable food transformation with its guiding principles, so that the wisdoms of faiths can be implemented into dietary practices. 2. How to maximize the influence of institutions and activists to jointly promote the "2030 Initiative" (the goal of reducing meat consumption by 30% in 2030)? Explore ways in which the plant based community and its supporters can collaborate, form consensus, and jointly promote our shared objectives. Sustainable transformation of the food system, animal welfare, youth leadership, and other initiatives promoted by the Good Food Fund, World Animal Protection, Act Asia, and other related organizations play an important role in enhancing the public's concept of plant based diet. Projects that solve practical issues and provide inspirations for diet transformation can support the process. For example, the Good Food Fund announced the launch of the “Meatless Monday” project in China and a list of initial participating restaurants and organizations. Representatives of some award-winning institutes also shared keynotes and visions for how they would promote this initiative. 3. How can domestic and international plant based products contribute to changes in diet and food systems in a positive way? Guests from domestic and international plant meat and dairy brands shared with us their experience in achieving this goal. From the perspective of the supplier, it begins with product innovation, offering the public an opportunity for lifestyle changes, and ensuring quality of products and users experience Food suppliers use localized brand strategies to spread a more environmentally friendly lifestyle, advocating young people to establish sustainable consumption habits, and obtain more recognition and support from consumers, thereby turning to more sustainable food consumption. Скрыть

1. Traditional Chinese religions and their principle beliefs (i.e. vegetarianism of Chinese Buddhism and its principles of compassion), have a positive impact on food transformation. Our keynote speakers discussed plant based diet from a Taoist longevity perspective, and others advocated for plant based diet as a new way of practicing mercy release (the practice of purchasing live animals sold for food for the purpose of freeing them in nature). The combination of traditional wisdoms and the daily practices of the new generation can and do provide solutions for various challenges. 2. Engagemen... Подробнееt of government agencies and corporations play a crucial part in the transformation of the food systems. Key decision makers can and do support the process of achieving fundamental changes on a regular basis. Solutions rooted in practical needs of industries and social development are particularly impactful and effective. 3. The research and development of plant based foods have been rapidly growing around the world, especially in Europe and America. In China, as of 2020, new types of plant meat, dairy and egg products have also begun to flood the market. This new development domestically is still in its early stages. Compared with Western countries, consumer response is very different. Opportunities and challenges for the development of plant based products in the country coexist. The objective of many brands is to establish effective communication with consumers in a positive way to better contribute to changes in diet and food systems. Скрыть

The focus of this particular UNFSS "China Dialogue" is to explore how plant based diet can contribute to the transformation of the food system. The transition to a plant based diet has a direct and far-reaching impact on the transformation of the current food system, as well as public health (chronic diseases, zoonotic diseases), planetary health (carbon neutrality, biodiversity), animal welfare, food security, and rural revitalization. Whether it can be timely and effective depends largely on how the vegan community utilizes systematic thinking, integrates issues of humanity, international po... Подробнееlicies, and modern scientific research methods to promote plant based diet and lifestyle creatively. Скрыть

There was some discussion on trust in technology. Although most believe that small-holders but also other stakeholders want to stick to what they know and that there is lack of education. However, another problem that was addressed was that most often technology is produced somewhere else and then most money goes to marketing and not educating the people in the areas to use the technology or maintain it. Also, the technologies often do not prioritize the main problem because it is not developed in cocreation with the community. Internet entrance was mentioned as a crucial point to empower smal... Подробнееl-holder farmers. However, the main question is how to make internet accessible to them. More research is needed on this. More research is needed on new business models and effective ways for cocreation in the process of technology development. It is not only education, but also working together and understanding main priorities in the food community. Скрыть

What is the value of a rights-based framework in terms of desired changes in the environmental and social impacts? 1. Basic right-based approaches to include technology Transformation of the food systems is hinged on the foundations of the rights to land, land use act protection for indigenous people, right to technology for technology inclusions needed in provisioning the attainment of SDG 7, 2, 5, 8 2. Technological advancements are hard to measure success for. Adoption and important not to forget the traditional methods and economic aspects of smallholders. 3. small scale farmers are the st... Подробнееakeholders most in need of empowerment. 4. Organic Agriculture as an innovative solution for small scale farmers to reach the organic market 5. Governments should encourage more public and private partnerships and enabling partnerships….and mass communication for internet accessibility for small scale farmers. 6. I would say that small scale farmers need to be heard, they are mostly the ones producing food in third countries. And we need to include them in the decision-making process because most of the solutions and decisions need to be applied by them 7. indeed, solutions don't need always to be technology-oriented. I also think that simplification of knowledge provided by researchers to small scale farmers will bridge the gap between the research providers and people in need of that knowledge. 8. small scale farmers are the stakeholders most in need of empowerment. 9. Many technology availabilities -- need someone to consolidate this and create a centralised hub 10. Make internet-accessible available for everyone 11. making these solutions locally-led and adaptive are great practices for smallholders Скрыть

What solutions already exist to make (technological) innovation accessible to all food system workers? SLYCAN Trust Building multi-actor partnerships and strengthening links between different actors (including farmers, supply/value chain actors, local and national government, private sector, financial institutions, telecommunications providers, research institutions etc.): https://www.slycantrust.org/multi-actor-partnership-on-climate-and-disaster-risk-financing-and-preparedness-in-the-context-of-the-insuresilience-global-partnershipHow can smallholders be safeguarded from exploitation by serv... Подробнееice or product providers? 1. Independent monitoring and evaluation and impact assessment mechanisms 2. Involve vulnerable and marginalized groups and communities and design interventions/technologies in a way that is inclusive, gender-responsive (or gender-transformative), accessible and free or affordable, context-specific, available in local languages, and with an interface that is intuitive and easy to understand/learn 3. The government should screen new technology coming into the people • Decentralization -- top-down approach • The community members have agreed to use the technology before it is brought in • Regulation should be done by the curator of social media rather than the government • For countries that want to limit the power of social media • Governments need to approach the end-users of the technology • A discussion forum needs to be in place for the farmers and the government 4. Most farmers do not understand the technology and how it can be used in their daily activities • The user needs to be educated on how to interact with the technology and how it applies to their lives so it can be used effectively • The technologies need to be tried a few times first • A long-term trial should be done to gauge the effects and to ensure the desired results will come as a result of the technology implementation What role could the community and the government play in this fair and accessible implementation? 1. Participation of communities and community-based organizations in policy- and decision-making processes; involvement of the community in data collection and monitoring processes; co-designed technological solutions and mechanisms 2. To add to the previous comment, learning diversity needs to be addressed for users/students of technology 3. Most vulnerable and marginalized people need to be purposefully included and capacitated, so they are not left behind. Most technology is adopted currently in urban areas. Скрыть

What would be the first key areas of action to improve technological implementation for all? • Youth engagement • More people our age are learning and adopting new technology and learn it • They can empower and teach others how to use the new technology • This could help with technology implementation 2. Vocational training schools • These provide hands-on resources beyond universities that focus on research • Vocational training can go beyond taking those people who do not have college experience and they can get trained for 6 months to become proficient in technology 3. Technolog... Подробнееy needs to be more adaptable • For people with disabilities to be more inclusive 4. Submitting projects to a corresponding government entity 5. Youth organizations • Leverage social media • This spreads awareness and adoption 6. Digital advisory and extension services including digital market linkages 7. To ensure smallholder farmer specific technologies in irrigation and other allied activities and making it accessible for everyone. 8. Investment for capacity building in technology use Скрыть

How can technology leverage transition towards more resilient food systems and what are the downsides? 1. Technology that is being invented is labour intensive and if manpower is now available it cannot be used 2. The benefits are too long-term • This dissuades people from using it 3. Sustainable supply energy needs to be used for a huge impact • Solar panels, and biofuels 4. lack of access to finance is an issue that impairs innovation • There should be grants or waivers for those who are practising techniques with technology that would promote and grant access to the tech • Lower tax... Подробнееes 5. Technology can positively impact the food systems by empowering youth with knowledge and skills to provide and design solutions that impact and affect the weak sectors in the food system • There are not many youths engaged in this activity • Those who are engaged have low skills to do so • If they were empowered, they would have a larger impact 6. Tech in the market sector needs to happen • Products are purchasing online • It would be easy for a farmer to market products online • A smartphone where farmers could sell their products and attract other farmers and individuals to the products 7. Technology is needed to help with the 20 to 40% post-harvest food loss • Technology to gain this back would have a large impact 8. Hydroponics can be used to solve this • Food can be produced next to urban centres • Shortens the distance from producer to consumer • In situ production • Wholefoods can produce food on the rooftop and sell it in their stores 9. Downsides • Efficiency of technology • We cannot be too reliant on technology on food process or any other everyday use and we need to have contingency plans in place • An alternative way to collect data into the resources we need • Internet of things tool to become more efficient. To automatize things that farmers do in the greenhouse 10. Parametric insurance schemes through mobile access (but not a one-size-fits-all solution) 11. Downside: microclimatic variations can lead to farmers even within a small area being affected very differently by climate impacts/disasters, potential mismatches between pay-outs and damages (basis risk), farmers often are not aware of insurance options or don’t trust them 12. Downside: transition costs and technical expertise needed can be an access barrier for smallholder farmers 13. digital literacy / mobile phones there are, but computers less 14. Dependence on new service providers that work as monopoly instead of building on technology 15. Improving supply chain redundancies and losses: enhancing the connection between growers and end-users leveraging on technology to aggregate data 16. Swarm technology and small tractors can support healthy soil, due to less depletion. Also, multi-cropping improves the health of crops and supports pest and disease protection. Скрыть

What solutions already exist on AgTech Innovation, Digital Transformation in disaster and risk prevention for a resilient and shockproof food system? 1. We need to address the growing demand for food while using significantly fewer resources 2. Climate-smart practices are being used to combat disasters a. Most farmers are practising agroforestry and other methodology with positive results 3. FinTech solution for inclusive social coverage and financial inclusion to rural farmers a. Normally it takes many months for repayment. Now with mobile technology and weather forecasting, insurance firms o... Подробнееr governmental insurance firms can pay quicker (by verification of GPS and sending confirmed pictures) 4. Agro-meteorological advisory through mobile apps (Seasonal Rainfall Prediction) a. Normally farmers grow in Sri Lanka what they are used to plant b. Information could tell climate trends for the island c. Information could inform about market trends d. For example, one has a Major and Minor season in Sri Lanka. Farmers grow paddy stable crops and additional vegetable crops like big onions but require not heavy rain 5. Artificial Intelligence and Machine learning to predict best crops on best soils by aggregating relevant databases from satellites, soil measures, weather stations. 6. Soil measurements for higher quality (biodiversity, carbon, nutrient content). Higher carbon content will help to retain the water, which is good for heavy rain or droughts. 7. Drone visuals for growth differences of crops on soils and measure which certain soils spots perform less. 8. Blockchain for food monitoring and traceability via blockchain and sealed products. 9. Agrovoltaics solutions for energy-efficient solutions like irrigation systems, biomass processing and growing biofertilizers a. Challenges and constraints are strict due to the limitations of smallholders to access these technologies. b. however, on Agrovoltaics in Nigeria, we are actively working with stakeholders in managing and coordinating data from Technology Needs Assessment for these farmers 10. Climate-smart farming, surveillance by drones 11. help across the value chain, how -> extension agents 12. Food visibility by blockchain for confirming the flow of products. This improves food safety away from bulk products and could link to consumers that can pay higher. a. Downside: data/evidence base required for fintech/digital solutions/etc. might not be sufficient in many countries 13. Digital financial services require financial literacy and inclusion as well as technology access 14. World Resources Institute has also a lot of information, use information about weather forecasts etc, that can be used for crop managing. Скрыть

Issues addressed in the Main Session Discussions - One of the issues in Africa and other (developing) countries is that the governments promise subsidies for innovations, also in times of this pandemic. However, money doesn't reach the farmers efficiently and gets stuck somewhere in the top-down process. A solution for this is a system where the subsidies can be monitored or controlled, maybe via cooperatives or larger farmers communities to get a stronger voice compared to all the smallholder farms individually. Another issue is digital traceability. Now it is unclear where products that cons... Подробнееumers buy exactly come from. With a passport (for example a QR-code) on a product, you create certain transparency on where a product comes from and what it contains. With a clear view of the production chain and ingredients of a product, the consumers will be more aware of what they buy. In both issues, blockchain can offer major benefits by improving transparency. - Often technology is developed outside of the country where it is intended to be used. Most of the farmers know the context in which they work than most of the technology developers. Famers also have a different idea of priorities and problems that can be supported with technology. This creates trust issues and a lack of adoption of technology. In addition, in big countries, farms can be found in regions all over the country, which all deal with different climate conditions. When new technologies are introduced in farming within these countries, it might be wise to adapt training for the farmers on their specific region. As the climate conditions might affect how to implement a certain technology in your work. Look in this to new business models and co-creation in the process of technology development. It is important to work with the rest of the supply chain and investment should also be in training local people with skills to manufacture, repair and maintain the technology. Making these solutions locally-led and adaptive are great practices and building multi-actor partnerships and strengthening links between different actors (including farmers, supply/value chain actors, local and national government, private sector, financial institutions, telecommunications providers, research institutions etc.) could help in this. - We must channel the energy of young people. Most students have problems finding a project in school on a good topic. Let them do relevant topics for the community and build on these projects for future studies. More people our age are learning and adapting to new technology and learn it. They can empower and teach others how to use the new technology. In addition, governments could provide vocational training for people who do not have college experience and train them for 6 months to become proficient in a certain technology. - Smallholders can be safe-guarded from exploitation by service or product providers by having community members agreed to use the technology before it is brought in. In addition, independent monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment mechanisms are important. A national or local discussion forum could be used for this. - There are already many different technologies available, there is a need to consolidate this and create centralised hubs, improving visibility. Here shared resources can be made available. For instance, cold chain infrastructure or good internet access with great weather forecasting for all. Internet entrance should therefore be a fundamental right. - Another issue is that technological advancements and success of adoption (without forgetting traditional methods/knowledge and economic aspects of smallholders) are hard to measure. It is therefore important to explore better assessment methods for effective adoption of technology, meaning adoption that co-exists and is co-developed with small-holders, local communities, and that support traditional methods and cultures. - Solutions don't always need to be technology-oriented. Simplification of knowledge provided by researchers to small scale farmers will bridge the gap between the research providers and people in need of that knowledge. Скрыть

Session Objective: • Identifying solutions to overcoming barriers to technologically supported regenerative agriculture transition This dialogue was curated to discuss the following: • Highlighting challenges with resilience in agricultural business, implementation of innovative solutions, and barriers in adopting technological solutions. • Identify solutions for the implementation of, and improved access to innovative, inclusive, fair, and sustainable development for all. • Describe ideas towards constructive, inclusive and mutual cooperation and partnership between researchers, farme... Подробнееrs, and government along the value chain. • Determine key areas of action towards more resilient, fair, social, and healthy food systems. Main findings of the dialogue: The Independent Dialogue was participatory and participants came from different institutional and stakeholder groups to deliberate on the future of food and suggested actions towards transformational food systems adopting new technologies, leveraging existing solutions and blending action best impact standards with society approach for inclusive participation to achieving The Objectives of The Food Systems Summit and overall objective of SDG 2 while sustaining the planet, promoting innovation, improving global food safety and conserving natural resources through adaptive use of resources (SDG 12). The discussion also addressed specific interconnected SDGs and suggested actions to adopting best impact standards in the food systems value chain and across all other action tracks. Скрыть

Pregunta 1 Vías de acción para escalar la pequeña agricultura, cuales los mayores retos Patricia. Trabajar con el consumidor, fomentar el consumo de producto sanos Juan Manuel. Los diálogos sobre los Sistemas Agroalimentatrios, desde IICA se promueve la Red de Campeones, dialogo al interior del IICA con un Seminario Internacional la Agricultura familiar con gestión socio empresarial, articulación al mercado, fortalecimiento de las capacidades de los agricultores, investigación sobre los productos poco conocidos o poco utilizados en la alimentación Julia. La alimentación moderna es mon... Подробнееótona, se usan pocos productos, se deben recuperar los productos ancestrales, nutritivos, en las fincas pequeñas se protegen estos y se usan en la alimentación, se debe tener cuidado con no caer en la trampa que puede impulsar el comercio como paso con la quinua en Peru que el mercado se lleva el producto y el país no lo puede consumir. Luis Gonzalez. De OPA organización por los derechos agroecológicos de Parana, llevan 25 años en la construcción de un Instituto de Desarrollo Rural del Estado Vanessa. Desde lo pequeño se produce, se lleva a los mercados locales, depende mas de las temporadas de producción por cosechas, en una relación de alimento con el territorio, no como los supermercados que mantienen de todo, importado, no fresco Jeronimo. Con el Covid hubo un aumento en el consumo de productos procesados, esto va en contra de la misma salud Grupo 2 Julia Acciones propuestas a la Cumbre Cristina. De IFOAM en Roma, Dice que hay un debate en Naciones Unidas, hay un documento del Comité para la Seguridad Alimentaria donde se pone en duda el apoyo a la agroecología, si es o no importante, si es reducir el uso de plaguicidas como uso racional, Mexico propone eliminar el glifosato para 2024, no todos apoyan Dice que se deben promover las políticas públicas, el mercado internacional perjudica a los pequeños, la lucha política es difícil, se deben lograr el reconocimiento de los derechos de los agricultores, como incidir en los gobiernos locales para que en los eventos tengan posturas que apoyen y no lo contrario, políticas como cortar el subsidio a los agroquímicos y dar apoyo al pequeño agricultor Luis. Con la alcaldía de Piracuara en Curitiba, la Asociación Agroecológica local logra incidencia política en la municipalidad, se pide desde alli, una moción de apoyo a esta experiencia, seguir trabajando desde lo local Margarita. En el evento grande, plantear como es el uso del agua , del aire, la producción de alimentos, por ejemplo la producción de aguacate (palta), en Europa a 3 por 1 euro, la demanda esta promoviendo el crecimiento del monocultivo que como consecuencia en los países productores esta acabando con el agua, podría haber como un jurado internacional que regule a las empresas, que hayan políticas locales y globales, trabajar el tema de conciencia de la población (ejemplo con las papas nativas) Julia. Los mercados estimulan los monocultivos, considerar unas regulaciones regionales con reglas de juego para incidir en el consumidor Juna Manuel. Algunas organizaciones plantean no participar en el evento, la Cumbre, pero eso también es dejar “la cancha libre”, no dar la batalla, no dejar el terreno libre porque las transformaciones no van a venir de arriba, las propuestas vienen de abajo, debe haber una suma de fuerzas desde pequeños núcleos. La Ley Nacional de agricultura orgánica en Argentina, se definen regiones orgánicas con gobiernos locales. Llevar propuestas concretas a la Cumbre desde el IICA, desarrollar protocolos para la salud del suelo, planes de financiación Leticia. Como agricultora orgánica, juntar fuerzas, una alimentación sana, Foro Brasileño y Foro Latinoamericano, otras formas de comercialización, luchas políticas y sociales 3. Vanessa. Que acciones para divulgar mas allá de la Cumbre Margarita. Llevar estos eventos a nivel país, la gente no sabe de la Cumbre, muchas organizaciones de agricultores contribuyen a aumentar la visión política, difundir en medios de comunicación, las ONG de Agricultura Familiar por país deben promover la reflexión Jerónimo. SPP Red de pequeños Agricultores promover los métodos de cultivo y consumo, unir esfuerzos del movimiento orgánico y agroecológico, hay puntos comunes, en pequeña escala hay fuerza colectiva, horizontalidad, hay dialogo con Скрыть

Considero que la invitación a participar libremente, sin barreras para expresarse desde la perspectiva del productor y participante latinoamericano, que implica otra visión, por las condiciones sociales, económicas y políticas, fue muy clara, desde la convocatoria enviada hasta las palabras de bienvenida y saludo desde INOFO e IFOAM A L. el promover la presentación de experiencias y perspectivas desde visiones latinoamericanas diversas y en dos países también enriquece los elementos para invitar al dialogo, lastimosamente no se pudieron realizar por separado las 3 mesas lo que hubiera p... Подробнееermitido mayor participación de los asistentes, sin embargo, en las notas recogidas por los responsables de las mesas se expresan opiniones, visiones y propuestas muy diversas e importantes que demuestran que hay un conocimiento, un trabajo de años en los temas relacionados y el interés manifiesto de participar en la construcción de una visión diferente, en aportar a encontrar soluciones a una problemática tan sentida más aun en la actual crisis ambiental y de salud, es un momento propicio para trabajar desde nuestra mirada latinoamericana no solo de cara a la Cumbre, sino de cara al futuro de la región, nuestras generaciones venideras y del planeta. Скрыть

Some participants identified consumers as being most responsible for driving change towards considering the environmental, social and human dimensions of value into food chains. Many participants thought governments and institutions have the biggest responsibility as policy drives consumers’ and producers’ behaviour. However, the participants were unanimous in considering that all actors, including consumers, have a share of responsibility and power to change the situation.