Глобальный Диалог
Местоположение:
Без границ
Discussion topic outcome
Theme 1, Group 1.2 Integrating food systems transformation into urban and territorial governance and planning Challenges Participants identified challenges at the local, city level that make it hard to get food on the urban political agenda and to pursue an integrated approach: Local politicians tend not to see food as part of the urban agenda due to the persistent view that production happens in rural areas and consumption in urban. Local executive sees only some, separate aspects of food, such as food poverty, school canteens, and public procurement. They are unable to see the bigger picture
... Подробнее and inter-connections, and how initiatives from across departments/policy domains can form part of a comprehensive framework and strategy. Participants also identified challenges of cooperation between governance levels – especially between local and national levels. One city participant said that their city advances the food agenda ‘in spite of [national] government’, rather than being enabled by a multi-level governance framework. Another is involved in efforts to connect municipalities working on food within the same geographical region, which enables integrated working in policy areas that are devolved to regions in their country (health, agriculture), but the absence of the national and EU levels means actions are not as effective as they might be. Urgent actions Participants emphasized the need to be opportunistic to get food on the local government agenda in cities, and seize upon every occasion to reframe the food system as an urban issue and promote integrated working. At present, there is an opportunity to harness the experiences of COVID-19 as a basis for securing political will for long-term, transformative action. This can be done in several ways: strong advocacy to ensure policy-makers understand that the COVID-19 food crisis was not a one off but symptomatic of the fragility of urban food systems; maintaining and reinforcing new network connections that emerged during the emergency response; reviewing of governance structures and processes in light of the COVID-19 experience, to ensure they have the adaptive capacity to pivot towards ways of working in future emergencies. Participants saw a need for more assessments of urban food systems using a systemic approach, to: i) build a common understanding of key issues to be addressed; ii) generate data (currently data is not systematically collected because food systems are not on the political agenda, but without data it is difficult to get food systems on the agenda). They acknowledged an urgent need for cities to documenting their experiences and share lesson, both about what worked and what did not. There is also a need to assist local stakeholders in adapting actions that have been tried and tested elsewhere to their specific context. Participants stressed that getting food on the long-term agenda is a long-term process. Food activists need to be resilient to knock-backs, think strategically about relationships, and be mindful of 4- to 5- year election cycles. Tactics for securing and retaining buy-in to the food agenda Approaching decision-makers within the municipality both at the institutional level and bottom-up through community advocacy. Providing data to politicians; taking them on learning journeys to experience aspects of the food system. Identifying a political champion to advocate within local government. Mobilizing civil society to put on pressure on politicians. Once food is firmly on the agenda in the city, using both hard (legislative) and soft (influence) power to push the message and retain engagement. Engaging with the community, voluntary sector and food growing organizations provide energy, ideas, and capacity Ensuring a governance model in which the voices of citizens are heard, and identifying who is not at the table on a continuous basis. Inclusivity is key to tapping local wisdom and developing actions based on community need. Скрыть
Направления деятельности: 4
Ключевые слова: Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Innovation, Policy, Trade-offs, Women & Youth Empowerment