Independent Dialogue Delivering a Global Coalition for Game Changing Solutions at Scale Geographical focus: No borders Discussion topic outcome Discussion Topics, Group 5 & 7 Discussion Topics, Group 5 By 2030, 100 million farmers have adopted regenerative agriculture practices, supported by 1 billion consumers who demand and support products coming from regenerative agriculture. ACTIONS 1. Ensure that regenerative agriculture (RA) is defined in a way that encourages access to tools and technology. RA is about modern agriculture and about technology and innovation (this may include fertilizer and inputs). Modern agriculture can help the soil, biodiversity, etc. • The voice of the farmer (all farmers) should be heard. 2. Provide ... Read moretools and tech for small- to medium-sized export-oriented agricultural producers in the Global South. 3. Reach all farmers, because in some contexts, farmers don’t have access to knowledge and resources. Additionally, access to technology may not be affordable, and many new technologies are not made for small scale farmers; small scale farm technology can be substandard/outdated. Reach them through: • Government policy and legislation • Forms of shared ownership. Shareholders in countries can create a boost of benefits reaching the farmers that work with these countries. • Distribute innovations to other countries: more crop per drop, better crops with higher nutrition. • Promote a science-based approach and international standards: (e.g. global statements, global policy approaches/ frameworks), that nations can readily align themselves with. • International companies that have the access/resources can hand over the tools and tech to the farmers. • Create broad statements from the UNFSS that are science-based and provide access to tools and technology to guide national-level action. 4. Ensure that RA products are affordable for consumers to demand RA products. 5. Buy farmer direct to shorten value chain where available. PARTNERSHIPS 1. Harmonize a baseline of legislation, including standards, to create a level playing field. This is achieved via strong international engagement. 2. Leverage farmer networks where there has been success. For example, the Global Farmer Network, which consists of local and regional industry leaders and role models who can provide technology demonstrations, break down myths, and add a voice to the regulatory legislation discussion. The key is for this to be practical to provide local credibility to demonstrate that technology isn’t scary or that companies aren’t trying to take advantage of local farmers. Discussion Topic, Group 7 By 2030, 300+ million small scale agricultural producers have become resilient to climate change. ACTIONS 1. Foster the adoption of new technologies by smallholder farmers by showing that they address/solve the risk of losing crops that are so precious. 2. Dignify lives by addressing basic needs such as better living, water, and other basic supplies. • Infrastructure is important. Farmers need access to basic needs and technology, but it is difficult to talk about innovation when they don’t have access to basic resources like water. 3. Ensure financial investment – make lines of credit available for smallholders with less guarantee requirements. 4. Provide tech tools via mobile phones – they are the key device. Social media is also an important tool. • Better use of digital space - For example, companies like Bayer could provide technology to diagnose plant diseases. This could also connect to government information and support. • Digital platforms - Big data works if is run in a massive way and includes a lot of data, especially regarding smallholders. The consolidation of data is impossible – data needs to be in collaboration platforms. • Digital solutions are key. • Re-engineer rural area schools for the future. Include policy related topics in the curriculum. 5. Rethink the role of philanthropy. PARTNERSHIPS 1. Develop partnership platforms to benefit small farmers; also involve governments. 2. Companies that provide digital tools should work in collaboration platforms; the consolidation of data is very difficult with low number of farmers. Big data performance will increase with the scale-up of information. Read less Action Track(s): 2, 3, 5 Keywords: Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy, Women & Youth Empowerment
Independent Dialogue Delivering a Global Coalition for Game Changing Solutions at Scale Geographical focus: No borders Discussion topic outcome Discussion Topic, Group 4 By 2030, more than half of investment in agricultural innovation provides end-to-end solutions that support the SDGs related to food, climate, and environment. ACTIONS 1. Recognize economic sustainability as an essential aspect of environmental and social sustainability. 2. Recognize that smallholder farmers are often on the frontlines of catastrophic impacts of climate change, nature loss, deepening poverty, and the wide inequality gap. 3. Grow financial investments in innovative and sustainable solutions by: • Promoting multi-lateral funding and creating a flow of... Read more financial investments in regions that are trying to advance agricultural innovation. Recognize that LMICs with a dependence on agriculture are key; help them to leapfrog the agricultural development curve and deliver benefits for people, nature, and climate. • Leveraging public funding to promote private financial investments, such as concession financing and de-risking. • Reducing exorbitant interest rates that put unreasonable burdens on farmers, particularly smallholder farmers. For example, 20+% in West Africa. • Driving procurement to regions that are advancing agricultural innovation. • Using carbon financing approaches to compensate regions for emissions reductions. • Shifting from a value chain to an ecosystems approach, while developing internal knowledge along the way. • De-risking food systems through innovation - making progress with climate and information systems. • Making innovations accessible, including to people who are the most vulnerable. • Rethinking how the private sector itself works together – because this often involves competitors working together. Right now, companies work on their own, using various platforms, which means other actors must pick companies to work with rather than picking a shared initiative on which to work. • Transforming the regulatory systems to promote end-to-end solutions, accelerating speed to address the urgency, and harmonizing regulations across countries. • Fostering collaboration among private companies in addressing pre-competitive issues. • Developing innovative payment systems to support sustainable farming. For example, using digital tech for consumer payments to go directly to farmers. 4. Ensure that the other half of investment is not actively undermining the SDGs. That is, if more than half of investment in agricultural innovation provides end-to-end solutions that support the SDGs, those efforts might yield limited results if there is little or no control over the other half of investment. PARTNERSHIPS Foster partnerships: 1. Between public and private actors to produce blended finance streams. 2. Between farmers and the private sector, including farmers who are often excluded because they don’t fit as easily within company sustainability paradigms. 3. Between the private sector and development banks for systemic approaches to leverage funding and expertise, while gathering real-time insights. 4. With consumers, to engage them in finding solutions. For example, farmer earnings are not keeping pace with consumer prices. 5. Among private sector companies to advance solutions. 6. With telecom and mobile banking providers to return more market value back to producers. 7. With research and development to inform private sector investment. Read less Action Track(s): 3, 5 Keywords: Finance, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy
Independent Dialogue Delivering a Global Coalition for Game Changing Solutions at Scale Geographical focus: No borders Discussion topic outcome Discussion Topic, Group 3 By 2030, soil health is managed sustainably through sequestration and organic carbon content, rewarding farmers and land managers through payments for ecosystem services, carbon farming and trading carbon credits. ACTIONS 1. Better understand and increase the use of MRV (Measurement, Report and Verification) with technology, as soil is the most critical and diverse area related to food systems. • Practices need to be flexible to each region across the world. 2. Consider how to address the economics considering the market has been moving farmers away from diversifica... Read moretion. 3. Climate finance is a must; this includes cover crops for smallholders. 4. Award early adopters of carbon markets. This will help uncover the value of improving soil health. 5. Need to improve/scale up projects around: • Soil carbon • Transparency for carbon (blockchain) • Science-based understanding of technologies and products which enable no-till (such as some products important for farmers, like herbicides) • Capacity building • Landscape approach 6. Engage youth – for example, through the Climate Smart Youth Ag. This initiative aims to engage 100 million youth. PARTNERSHIPS 1. A “soil hub” can be an umbrella to ensure synergy in each project to deliver each region’s vision and include farmer and youth voices. It is crucial to reinforce and support potential solution clusters coming through Action Track 3. Living Soils of the Americas (LiSA) – founded by IICA and Ohio State University with Dr Rattan Lal and considered a lighthouse project by the World Economic Forum. Bayer, PepsiCo, and other companies are supporting it and welcome newcomers. 2. Regenerative food systems with a focus on regenerative foodscapes. These are meant to be food, action land- and seascapes that show the transformative impact of improved management practices which restore nature – climate-freshwater-biodiversity – in ways that are attuned to the local culture, economic and biophysical situation. • Implementation on initial foodscape in North West India, through the support of the Bezos Earth Fund. • Foodscape started in Latin America in the Argentine Gran Chaco with initial support from IKI (20M euro program across five foodscapes in LAR) and Nestle. Agenda setting science analysis will be issued on foodscapes in Aug 2021 with partners – FOLU, SystemIQ, and CCAFS. 3. Engage youth through the 100 mllion youth coalition. 4. In the US - in the central region TNC is working to make 100 million acres sustainable by to 2030. Also, Bayer is enrolling farmers in a carbon sequestration program that pays farmers for sequestering carbon through specific practices. Read less Action Track(s): 3 Keywords: Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Innovation, Policy, Women & Youth Empowerment
Independent Dialogue Delivering a Global Coalition for Game Changing Solutions at Scale Geographical focus: No borders Discussion topic outcome Discussion Topic, Group 2 By 2030, livestock production ensures planetary health by fostering soil health, soil fertility, increased carbon sequestration, and biodiversity services. ACTIONS 1. Increase promotion and knowledge-sharing about sustainable livestock production practices. • Create collaboration between smaller/newer producers and more experienced producers to create a farmer-to-farmer knowledge exchange. • Capture, study, and share traditional knowledge, especially integrated farming systems that provide ecosystem services and support livelihoods, to understand the contexts with... Read morein which they work best. • Ensure women have the same access as men to education. 2. Create blended finance mechanisms and tailored financial instruments for farmers and increase the total availability of finance. • In certain locations this could be transition financing to move from unstable production to stable production methods, i.e. to reduce deforestation in Latin America. 3. Examples of successful practices that could be scaled up: • Create a global beef quality assurance program like the U.S. Beef Quality Assurance Program. • Integrated smallholder farming systems that have benefits for food security and income, and provide ample ecosystem services, such as those in Cambodia that also use small biodigesters to provide energy to cook food. • Successful adoption of integrated approaches that include other tree species and livestock by coffee farmers. 4. Share the evidence of sustainable production with consumers, help them understand that livestock production can be a solution to help increase demand for sustainable production. 5. Adapt innovations to work within local contexts. 6. Provide incentives for adopting innovations and solutions. For example: • Incentivize smallholder farmers to transition to more sustainable practices. • Incentivize farmers to improve the quality and sustainability of livestock production, as is already done in Germany. • Incentivize farmers to promote carbon sequestration. Find financial solutions to bring measurement tools, such as remote sensing, to smallholder farmers in developing countries; otherwise, measurement is prohibitively expensive. 7. Drive progress with government regulations and laws that repurpose subsidies, and support incentive programs. PARTNERSHIPS Foster partnerships: 1. Among players involved in the larger context of sustainable development, such as health and environment, for a more holistic approach for interventions, innovation, and solutions. 2. Between smaller, newer producers and those with more experience, as well as multi-generational farmers. 3. Between countries – both developing and developed. 4. With the financial sector, through blended finance mechanisms and tailored financial instruments. 5. Between retailers, public sector, farmers, and farmer associations. 6. Researchers and scientists who can disseminate information to farmers and consumers. 7. With animal agriculture alliances, USFRA, WFO, etc. and other rancher/farmer groups. 8. Tech experts who have monitoring methodologies, including those for carbon sequestration. 9. With schools, by providing locally grown sustainable food, especially in countries greatly relying on smallholder farmers. Read less Action Track(s): 3 Keywords: Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Innovation, Policy, Women & Youth Empowerment
Independent Dialogue Delivering a Global Coalition for Game Changing Solutions at Scale Geographical focus: No borders Discussion topic outcome Discussion Topic, Group 1 By 2030, food loss and waste have decreased by 50% across key supply chains and demand for food production has diminished proportionally, leading to lower production emissions. ACTIONS 1. Recognize the long-standing inequalities that have been exposed by COVID, the Black Lives Matter movement and the present “policy window” to address these inequalities. Given this context, the dialogue process is a moment of opportunity that should not be squandered. 2. Recognize the urgency. There are only nine harvests remaining until 2030 to get this right. 3. Recognize lesson... Read mores learned from food banks in 2020. It was the first year where 85% of the food they distributed was recovered from the industrial/agriculture sector (not purchased). There was a sense of solidarity among the communities they worked with, and there was no decrease in the amount of food distributed. 4. Map the actions that would lead to reduced production. Companies should have public commitments on reduced production based on food loss reduction programs. Indicators that would demonstrate this could be identified. • Companies and producers are there to create products to sell. Therefore, decreasing food loss will not necessarily lead to a reduction in production. 5. Understand the unique challenges facing smallholder farmers and provide resources to help them. • Understand and acknowledge the unique challenges facing smallholder farmers, who first need to meet their daily needs before addressing food loss. • Provide technical support and guidance to smallholder farmers to reduce food loss from the beginning of production. • Scale programs that assist smallholder farmers in distributing products via larger producers. • Work with the private sector to get insurance to small and medium farms. The group discussed a current example in Latin America. • Find ways to help smallholder farmers stay in the market when international trade is not possible. PARTNERSHIPS Foster partnerships with: 1. Organizations working in the broader context of sustainable development, beyond the usual stakeholders who are involved in the food supply chain. 2. Organizations that are addressing hunger and poverty. This is what food banks do, by adopting a holistic approach that includes technology, investment, new practices, and innovation, while trying to address human behaviors that cause food waste. 3. Private sector. This includes helping to create innovative insurance products to address the needs of smallholder famers. 4. Government agencies, like the ministries of agriculture, environment, and social protection, who play an important role in providing technical assistance. Via partnerships with governments, there can be more effective outreach, financial support, and assistance to bring useful innovations to smallholder farmers in remote rural areas. Read less Action Track(s): 2 Keywords: Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy
Independent Dialogue Delivering a Global Coalition for Game Changing Solutions at Scale Geographical focus: No borders Main findings ACTIONS 1. Support smallholder farmers in adopting evidence-based regenerative agriculture practices. • Recognize that smallholder farmers are often on the frontlines of catastrophic impacts of climate variability and change, nature loss, deepening poverty, and the wide inequality gap. • Develop evidence-based regenerative food systems and foodscapes that are attuned to local cultures, and economic and biophysical circumstances. • Integrated approaches are good for soil and the environment, healthy animals, and raising farmer productivity and livelihoods. • Provide smallholder farmers ... Read morewith technical assistance, resources, incentives, payment systems, and access to technology and connectivity, the best seeds, and crop insurance, so they can produce crops sustainably, while making a livelihood for themselves and their families. o Ensure that digital tools are co-created and farmer-centric to address their issues, including lowering production costs and improving incomes. o Explore payments for ecosystem services. • Address challenges facing women farmers, such as lack of access to land, financing, markets, agricultural training and education, suitable working conditions, and equal treatment. 2. Involve young people. • Make farming more appealing to young farmers, who are often in the best position to advance evidence-based scientific innovations and technologies for sustainable farming. • Provide school-based agriculture education, including experiential opportunities. 3. Share effective, evidence-based, scientific practices beyond the communities where they originated. • Create coalitions that share these practices among NGOs, extension services, etc., that provide services to farmers so information can be disseminated widely. • Bring awareness about market trade to allow farmers to sell their crops to secure living wages and prosperity. 4. Educate consumers. • Educate consumers about farming and making food decisions that are healthier and better for the planet. Build awareness of the impact of the excessive consumption of animal-sourced foods; provide guidance regarding healthy portion sizes; and make food label dates more easily understood. 5. Better align international policy. • Promote harmonization of legislation/standards across regulatory systems. • Foster end-to-end solutions working across the food system and address the concrete needs of end users. PARTNERSHIPS 1. With organizations that work in the larger context of sustainable development, beyond the usual stakeholders who are involved in the food supply chain, for a more holistic approach for interventions, innovation, and solutions. 2. Between research institutions, farmers, and consumers to support the development, deployment and scaling of evidence-based scientific innovations. 3. With and among various government agencies and ministries, including agriculture, environment, education, etc., to provide education, technical assistance and outreach, data collection, financial assistance, and financial investment to smallholder farmers in remote rural areas. Everyone in food systems can benefit from these partnerships including many other food system actors. 4. With the private sector, to bring innovation, digital technology, finance, and insurance products to farmers, especially smallholder farmers. 5. With schools, to provide agriculture education and provide a market for local farmers by providing locally grown sustainable food, especially in countries greatly relying on smallholder farmers. 6. With youth – include them in decision making and empower them to bring innovative solutions to farming, and the rest of the food system, as they are often early adopters of technology. 7. With consumers to help them understand the challenges and opportunities related to farming and the environment, the true cost of food, and how to create change through demanding sustainably grown food. 8. Within regional and context-specific coalitions that include technology providers, farmers, NGOs and INGOs, and businesses. 9. Between conservationists, policymakers, and farmers. 10. Among members in the value chain to reduce the cost of food related to transportation, food waste, and pest reduction. A close network of communication from a coalition/connection between farmer, supplier, wholesaler, etc. 11. Between regulatory systems coalitions to promote harmonization and end-to-end solutions. 12. Between governments to create more compatible and global solutions. Going forward, it will be key to continue existing coalitions, building on partnerships that are already doing the work, as well as create new coalitions and continue conversations with people from diverse backgrounds far beyond 2021 to ensure action. It is important to ensure young people are at the table, as youth are not only our future, but the planet is their future. It’s up to all of us to keep the conversation going – the UN, farmers, companies, agricultural workers, academia, researchers, etc. The Summit should just be the beginning. Read less Action Track(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Keywords: Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy, Trade-offs, Women & Youth Empowerment
Independent Dialogue Delivering a Global Coalition for Game Changing Solutions at Scale Geographical focus: No borders Major focus Hosted by CCAFS/CGIAR, the Earth Institute at Columbia University, and Bayer, this fourth and final dialogue brought together almost 100 key stakeholders from across our global food system to discuss game-changing solutions that can put us on a transformative path to an equitable, sustainable, climate-smart future. Following the five Action Tracks, this event opened with high-level presentations and then moved participants into groups for intensive, facilitated discussions that explored the solutions needed and how they can be delivered on the necessary scale. Through this dialogue, the game-c... Read morehanging solutions put forward will inspire action from global leaders in what is potentially a make-or-break year for international cooperation on sustainable food systems. The dialogue’s objectives were: • Identify current coalitions, partnerships, and programs that are aligned with priority game-changing solutions • Evaluate key actions to advance priority game-changing solutions • Identify key stakeholders for implementing these actions The MAJOR FOCUS topics from the group discussions were: 1. Consider food systems in the broader context of the SDGs Planning for action and partnerships for food systems transformation must be considered in the larger context of sustainable development, with a more holistic approach for interventions, innovation, and solutions. Transforming food systems will advance progress towards numerous SDGs, including no poverty, zero hunger, good health and well-being, gender equality, clean water and sanitation, decent work and economic growth, reduced inequalities, responsible consumption and production, climate action, life on land, and partnerships toward the goals. Addressing food systems in alignment with related SDGs will optimize results in serving humanity and the planet. 2. Address environmental threats and opportunities Biodiversity loss threatens humanity and the planet. Additionally, soil degradation interferes with carbon sequestration. Researchers and scientists are vital partners in developing new technologies to monitor and evaluate progress in mitigating the effects of climate change and biodiversity loss. Evidence-based scientific findings and innovations must be disseminated to farmers and inform policymakers and consumers. By aligning efforts, diverse stakeholders can work together to improve food systems for a healthy and sustainable planet. 3. Provide support and resources for smallholder farmers Providing smallholder farmers with technical assistance, access to technology and connectivity, the best seeds, and crop insurance, will promote sustainable farming while also improving farmers’ livelihoods. Regenerative food systems and foodscapes must be attuned to local cultures, and economic and biophysical circumstances to produce food, on land and in water, in ways that actively restore habitats, protect biodiversity, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. 4. Educate consumers for healthier food choices Educating consumers is essential to supporting food decisions that are healthier and better for the planet, according to evidence-based science. For example, stakeholders should build awareness of the impact of the excessive consumption of animal-sourced foods, provide guidance regarding healthy portion sizes, and label food more clearly with regard to “sell by” and “use by” dates. 5. Promote government and public policies to advance food systems transformation Developing evidence-based scientific recommendations from the UNFSS to guide national and international action will be key to advance access to nutritious food for all, better livelihoods for farmers, and a healthy planet. 6. Take a broad view of innovation Innovation is not only new technology – it is knowledge sharing and combining traditional knowledge and technology to create enriched practices that better farmers and their livelihoods. Promoting what is working and disseminating it through extension and application will close gaps and make innovations accessible to the smallest farmer. Innovation can apply to farming practices, how we share information, and how specific innovations are adapted to work in local contexts. Read less Action Track(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Keywords: Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy, Trade-offs, Women & Youth Empowerment
Independent Dialogue Moving Forward With Nutrition Programming In Liberia Geographical focus: Liberia Area of divergence One of the Four Discussion Groups documented an area of divergence around perceptions of household consumption inequality. In discussing nutrition as the focus of food security in Liberia, participants in one group held divergent views on whether men's (HH head) household consumption is prioritized over women's household consumption in rural, remote areas - particularly poor households sharing meagre amounts of food. Some participants held the view that the consumption amounts for men are always higher - given the most nutritious foods available (eg: protein) rather than offering them to child... Read moreren or women in home to improve their nutrition outcomes. Other participants held the view that there is no discrepancy in household consumption and that men and women have access to the same amounts of food in the home as evidenced by weight gain in women. Read less Action Track(s): 1 Keywords: Women & Youth Empowerment
Independent Dialogue Moving Forward With Nutrition Programming In Liberia Geographical focus: Liberia Discussion topic outcome GOVERNMENT IS A STRONG AND DYNAMIC LEADER IN NUTRITION PROGRAMMING Actions that are urgently needed: 1. Government needs to review its overall nutrition strategy to ensure it captures the urgency 2. Establish an integrated, multi-sectoral strategic approach to nutrition, specifically inclusion of hygiene awareness. 3. Increased awareness raising for legislative officials to reinforce advocacy for action by ministries and agencies 4. Government action to incentivize importation of nutritious foods 5. Increased funding of nutrition-related interventions by Government to demonstrate commitment to... Read more nutrition. 6. Intensify nutrition and education awareness in school curriculums beginning in primary schools, through to university in order to effect behavior change. 7. Collaboratively develop standards to fortify locally produced staple products - especially rice and cassava 8. Establishment of a decentralized agency focused on nutrition to drive coordinated actions towards nutrition interventions 9. Intensify efforts to strengthen the value chain inputs for diversified local food crops - especially rural storage and processing facilities & farm to market access Who should take these actions: 1. The Executive Branch of government as the policy and implementing arm should drive the shift in urgency towards nutrition. Their action is needed to create the enabling environment and lead with accountability for partners to support their priorities and interventions. 2. The elected officials in the Legislature should increase their level of oversight and advocacy on nutrition through their roles in national budget allocation and approval. 3. International and local partners supporting the priorities of Government 4. Inclusion of other sector lead agencies collaborating with Ministries of Health and Agriculture as lead agencies on nutrition and food security. Ways in which progress could be assessed: 1. Increased national and agency budget allocations to direct nutrition-related interventions 2. Articulation of an integrated, multi-sectoral nutrition strategy 3. Established local food standards for food fortification and safety 4. Increased local production and processing of diversified food crops 5. Improved statistics on women and child malnutrition, anemia and stunting 6. Improved educational attainment Challenges that might be anticipated as actions are implemented 1. Competing policy and political priorities with limited available fiscal resources 2. Coordination amongst donors and implementing partners, as well as within government across ministries and agencies. 3. Implementing decentralized activities and coordination in view of existing budgetary constraints Read less Action Track(s): 1, 5 Keywords: Data & Evidence, Finance, Governance, Policy, Women & Youth Empowerment
Independent Dialogue Moving Forward With Nutrition Programming In Liberia Geographical focus: Liberia Discussion topic outcome WOMEN AS CHAMPIONS OF HOUSEHOLD NUTRITION IN LIBERIA Actions that are urgently needed: 1. Perception change of cooking and household chores as a woman's duty vs providing nutritious meals in partnership with spouse for the improved health of the whole family. 2. Involve men at household and community level to understand the importance of nutrition, of the woman's role in providing nutritious food for children and family, and the value of nutrition for health outcomes. 3. Media engagement as part of a focused perception change awareness campaign to introduce notions of healthy, nutritious food ... Read moreavailable from existing farming and gardening. 4. Using women entrepreneurs to engage in dialogues with other women regarding roles in the home and the importance of nutritious food for family diet, provide positive reinforcement for modified norms of household roles, and serve as role models for women nutrition champions. 5. Enable men to be perception change agents given their more frequent/present role in policy decision-making spaces. 6. National government driven investment in locally produced foods 7. Promoting climate smart agriculture to increase resilience and yields of harvest and reduce the food production burden on women. 8. Establishment of a national agency to coordinate nutrition interventions. Who should take these actions: 1. Government should create an enabling environment to empower women in their roles as household nutrition champions 2. NGOs should increase awareness of the importance of women in changing nutrition outcomes in the home 3. Individual family members and community members should feel that nutrition is their individual responsibility for the outcomes of their young children and family members. 4. Male family members should be enlightened about the importance of burden food gathering and preparation on women and supporting her to provide improved nutrition for the family. 5. Universal acceptance of nutrition as a human right which should be championed by Government. Ways in which progress could be assessed: 1. Reduction in women and child malnutrition, anemia and underweight statistics 2. Increased local production and consumption of locally-produced food. 3. Increased land access, titles/rights for women 4. Women's involvement in household decision-making beyond domestic chores (eg. financial decisions) Challenges that might be anticipated as actions are implemented. 1. Difficulty with accepting perception change of women's roles from men, older women, community leaders and authorities. 2. Building a critical mass of men and women to drive behavior change around roles of women 3. Continued low enrollments for girls limits access to nutrition education and awareness and exposure to become nutrition household champions Read less Action Track(s): 1, 5 Keywords: Data & Evidence, Human rights, Policy, Women & Youth Empowerment
Independent Dialogue Moving Forward With Nutrition Programming In Liberia Geographical focus: Liberia Discussion topic outcome NUTRITION AS THE FOCUS OF FOOD SECURITY IN LIBERIA Views on actions that are urgently needed: 1. Enabling policy to guide public consumption towards more nutritious foods through behavior change 2. Behavior change communications for people in hard-to reach areas with increased awareness of nutrition for health outcomes and nutritious foods. 3. Re-imagine the role of transportation systems in the focus on the availability of nutritious foods in remote, rural areas. 4. Increased advocacy for nutrition focus from multiple sectors - ex: Agriculture, Food Security, Reproductive Health and WASH 5. I... Read morencreased advocacy and behavior change around redistributing burden of food production, processing and preparation on women - women's empowerment. Who should take these actions: 1. Government was identified as the lead to act in a way that demonstrates the urgency and prioritization of nutrition. Particular mention of the need for increased capacities for coordination of nutrition-focused efforts at the sub-national level. 2. Civil society organizations - local NGOs and community based organizations working with farmers in remote areas should increase advocacy around the importance of nutrition 3. International and Local NGOs supporting government on policy formulation should also take lead roles in advancing these actions. Ways in which progress could be assessed: 1. Progress on coordination can be addressed through all partners in nutrition having a decentralized shared policy framework and plan for nutrition interventions. 2. Reduction in costs of nutritious foods 3. Improved indices on hunger index studies, malnutrition rates and stunting. 4. Increased consumption of locally grown foods and produce - also requires tracking of annual production quantities 5. Reduced reliance on imported staple foods such as rice Challenges that might be anticipated as actions are implemented: 1. Continued rural to urban migration may further advance the current rate of agriculture labor leaving rural areas. 2. Slow pace of Government's fiscal decentralization to finance sub-national interventions. 3. Transportation difficulties in remote, rural areas to access communities for increased outreach to populations 4. Difficulty of farmers and agro-entrepreneurs to transport produce and moving nutritious food to markets 4. Limited availability of storage facilities for storing crops and produce at rural markets. 5. Differing perspectives on the role of women in household nutrition Read less Action Track(s): 1, 5 Keywords: Governance, Human rights, Policy, Women & Youth Empowerment
Independent Dialogue Moving Forward With Nutrition Programming In Liberia Geographical focus: Liberia Discussion topic outcome STUNTING REDUCED TO 20% IN LINE WITH THE PRO-POOR AGENDA FOR PROSPERITY AND DEVELOPMENT: Actions that are urgently needed: 1. Scale-up advocacy on exclusive breastfeeding for babies and importance of nutrition for nursing mothers. 2. Government increased spending on nutrition-related programs through community healthcare initiatives 3. Expanding availability of local seeds for household gardening as dietary supplement 4. Establish a multi-sectoral coordination structure at national and sub-national level to elevate the importance of nutrition 5. Increase advocacy within Government - including ... Read moreelected legislative officials 6. Pursue an integrated approach to advocacy, including linkages between WASH, women's empowerment and nutrition 7. Expand preventative measures against malnutrition and programs creating awareness on food fortification and micro-nutrients. 8. Increased accountability of Government for existing and subsequent commitments to nutrition Who should take these actions: 1. Government has the primary responsibility to fund nutrition programs and drive advocacy 2. International and local NGOs should align programming to complement Government's efforts in view of resource constraints. 3. Local elected officials (Legislature) have a responsibility to increase budget allocations in their fiscal oversight role. Ways in which progress could be assessed: 1. Reduction in malnutrition and stunting rates 2. Increase in first 1000 days of life indicators 3. Uptake in exclusive breastfeeding for up to 6 months 4. Improved Human Development Indices for Liberia Challenges that might be anticipated as actions are implemented. 1. Difficulty with behavior change on dietary and consumption habits for people living in extreme poverty with access to meagre finances 2. Financial constraints and limited fiscal envelope may lead to continued underfunding of nutrition interventions. 3. Limited ability to hold multiple government stakeholders and NGO partners accountable for inactions towards scaled up nutrition programming. Read less Action Track(s): 1, 5 Keywords: Data & Evidence, Finance, Human rights, Policy, Women & Youth Empowerment
Independent Dialogue Moving Forward With Nutrition Programming In Liberia Geographical focus: Liberia Main findings 1. Data and Evidence remains critical to assess progress against the Pro Poor Agenda for Prosperity and Development and SDGs. 2. Must invest in a SMART Survey. 3. Need national & sub-national coordination structure for nutrition interventions (across sectors and partners) 4. A government-led multi-sectoral national strategy for nutrition - through a collaborative effort 5. Increased involvement of legislative actors in advocacy & budget allocations 6. Need to reduce domestic household burden on women and increase their economic empowerment 7. Increasing Government expenditure on target... Read moreed nutrition interventions 8. Importance of partners providing coordinated support towards Government's prioritized actions 9. Partners coordinate on advocacy for Government's consideration of policy priorities Read less Action Track(s): 1, 5 Keywords: Data & Evidence, Finance, Governance, Policy, Women & Youth Empowerment
Independent Dialogue Moving Forward With Nutrition Programming In Liberia Geographical focus: Liberia Major focus The dialogue's key focus was to (i) highlight the urgency for adequate and sustained investments in nutrition in Liberia in order to meet national development agenda targets outlined in the Pro-Poor Agenda for Prosperity and Development as well as the Sustainable Development Goals; and (ii) amplify the voices rural people living in poverty, especially women farmers and entrepreneurs working in remote areas, on this topic of nutrition and ensure their inclusion in the Global Dialogue Summit. (iii) ensure a multi-stakeholder & inclusive approach to consultations in Liberia ahead of the Globa... Read morel Summit Dialogue Read less Action Track(s): 1 Keywords: Data & Evidence, Policy, Women & Youth Empowerment
Independent Dialogue Nutrition: Bridging the gap between farm to fork for improved health and resilience in a changing environment Geographical focus: No borders Area of divergence There were few areas of strong divergence, but a number of issues or tensions recurred regularly throughout the meeting: • Planetary health vs Population health This was a topic of strong divergence. Despite the rising levels of NCDs and malnutrition in all its forms, it was considered by some participants that too much focus is given to sustainable diets – producing more resilient crops and enough food (calories) and skewed towards addressing environmental concerns and climate change. Nutrition and the quality of diets must be more strongly recognised as an equal priority in discussions, ... Read morepolicies and actions about sustainable diets and addressing climate change. The alternative views expressed were that the agricultural sector is one of the biggest contributors to climate change and there is more urgency associated with this challenge and thus, is being addressing via mechanisms such as COP26 and the Paris agreement. • Dietary guidelines vs consumer behaviour Although it was agreed that there are some commonalities and differences in existing food based dietary guidelines (FBDG) between countries, they are designed as ‘one-size-fits-all’ despite different nutritional requirements across the lifecourse and the need to develop FBDG tailored to specific populations was clearly identified. Opposing views expressed were that as the majority of citizens do not follow these guidelines anyway, does it really matter? It needs to be acknowledged that there are many reasons behind consumer food choices: people know what the guidelines are but choose to ignore them; not everyone is interested or chooses foods based on health or environmental impacts; there other priorities or barriers, mainly affordability, accessibility and inequalities, but also culture; and social aspects and pleasure which are important for wellbeing. Food environments are currently skewed towards promoting unhealthy food choices and we must make it easier for people to make healthy choices so this becomes the normal practice. There are key roles for food technology/processing and the food industry sector to produce more affordable nutritious foods that people want to eat and for social and behavioural science to develop methodologies and technologies to enable consumer uptake • Livestock vs Plant This is a strong area of divergence. Opinions were expressed that the livestock industry, particularly red meat agriculture is heavily criticised for having negative impacts of the environment and health. There needs to be a shift between the negative perceptions towards unhealthy processed meats as distinguished from eating smaller amounts of good quality meats. Too much focus is also given to meat-based diets with less emphasis on the impact of dairy. The nutritional value of foods such as meat and dairy may outweigh GHG emission, particularly in countries where nutritional intake is relatively poor, or consumption of animal sourced food is low. There needs to be a more balanced approach with nutrition incorporated into an integrated index for human and planetary health. Research investment on livestock farming should focus on making it become more carbon neutral and produce more affordable, nutritious, high quality animal-based foods. Opposing views from participants were that increased production and consumption of plant-based foods is better for both planetary and population health. Although, it was noted that not all plant-based foods are ‘healthy’ depending on the method of cooking or processing and that some plant-only diets may have some unintended consequences for health • Animal-based vs Plant-based proteins There is currently an unbalanced focus on protein when in many countries the majority of citizens consume sufficient quantities of protein (although the quality may differ). It is important to encourage re-balancing of protein from animal- and plant-based sources for planetary health but also consider the changes to micronutrient content and bioavailability and the impact on health. It should also be noted that other macronutrients are important, for example, in the UK the consumption levels of fibre need to be improved. • Transparency vs Health by stealth There was discussion about whether improving the consumption of more nutritious foods & diets should be conducted in a transparent way by consumer information and education to encourage the uptake of healthier foods or to use ‘stealth’ to make the composition of ‘less healthy foods healthier via modifying food production & processing methods such as, gene editing technologies, breeding lines selection, biofortification & food fortification and the reformulation of foods to provide affordable priced products in order to reach the consumers who need it most. • Nutrition vs Taste Evidence suggests that taste, price and convenience tend to be greater determinants of food choice than health, resulting in increased intake of processed foods. Better education & reduced availability of heavily processed, nutrient poor foods could help overcome this. We also need to increase consumer understanding that not all plant-based food products are necessarily healthier, particularly those that are highly- processed foods. Also, when choosing alternatives to animal derived foods, protein content should not be only consideration, other nutrients that are present in animal derived foods also need to be considered • Yield Vs Nutrition Farmers are often focused on yield over nutritional value, incentives to produce more nutritious & environmentally friendly produce would be advantageous. Read less Action Track(s): 1, 2, 3 Keywords: Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Innovation, Trade-offs
Independent Dialogue Nutrition: Bridging the gap between farm to fork for improved health and resilience in a changing environment Geographical focus: No borders Discussion topic outcome 10. Food System Vision A vital first step in tackling complex interdisciplinary challenges is the need to establish a vision of where we want to get to and what we want future food systems to look like. By gaining acceptance and agreement on common goals for a future food system, research and innovation can focus on areas that will have the greatest impact on achieving that vision. The importance of establishing a common goal was stressed by dialogue attendees using such methods as scenario modelling and foresight analysis. Once this is established, the appropriate metrics to measure the succe... Read moress of meeting this vision can be designed. Actions: • The commissioning of scenario modelling and foresight analysis to help frame common goals for a future food system • High-level commitments on agreeing what a future food system should look like • Agreed metrics on how to measure success of meeting this vision Success: • A shared understanding of the principles and goals of a future food system that progresses towards the SDGs Read less Action Track(s): 1, 2, 3, 5 Keywords: Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Governance, Innovation, Trade-offs
Independent Dialogue Nutrition: Bridging the gap between farm to fork for improved health and resilience in a changing environment Geographical focus: No borders Discussion topic outcome 9. Early Career Researcher training Alongside the need to support interdisciplinary research in tackling food systems challenges, it is critical to support capacity building and early career researchers. There is a need to build a resilient, sustainable research and innovation community with more opportunities for staff mobility between institutes and disciplines, and training for systems thinking and approaches. Large funding programmes can favour established researchers and research groups and should consider an element of future-proofing the sector. Actions: • Sandpit and network style ev... Read moreents for ECRs to discuss food system challenges • Training packages or programmes on systems thinking and systems approaches for ECRs • Greater opportunities for staff mobility between institutes and disciplines Success: • A better connected, interdisciplinary community of early career scientists and innovators building capacity and capability in food systems science. Read less Action Track(s): 1 Keywords: Innovation
Independent Dialogue Nutrition: Bridging the gap between farm to fork for improved health and resilience in a changing environment Geographical focus: No borders Discussion topic outcome 8. Global Averages There is a need to move away from using global averages when identifying the challenges facing food systems around the world. This approach can miss regional and local concerns which are dependent on regional and local context and can be lost when looking at international and even national data. Applying a one-size-fits-all approach can lead to resentment in areas where this is not appropriate and the building up of mistrust of decision makers. Actions: • Less use of global averages when framing food systems challenges across different contexts • Increased support for re... Read moresearch and innovation that focusses on local and regional challenges Success: • A better appreciation of local and regional challenges with interventions tailored to each specific context Read less Action Track(s): 1, 3 Keywords: Data & Evidence, Finance, Trade-offs
Independent Dialogue Nutrition: Bridging the gap between farm to fork for improved health and resilience in a changing environment Geographical focus: No borders Discussion topic outcome 7. Co-creation and co-design of research • Research and innovation that enables us to sustainably deliver affordable, acceptable and nutritious meals every day for everyone is a massive challenge and a range of academic disciplines, the private sectors and other sectors must to come together to deliver this. • It is important nutritionists are involved the co-creation/co-design of research projects that are focussed on food • Stakeholders and end-users of research such as industry, farmers, consumers and policymakers must be involved in the co-creation/co-design of research projects and ... Read moretraining to ensure viable products, uptake and impact of the research. For example, co-designing research with farmers who would be growing the new varieties of nutritionally dense food/crops, because if it takes extra efforts for farmers to grow those varieties without much return on investment then the whole research stays at laboratory level. Just as we have patient participation representatives in the design of human studies, we must involve consumers in food research, there is no point producing food products that consumers will not purchase or eat. This will provide some indication of the economic sustainability of interventions and the research impact in the medium to long-term (e.g. Environmental taxes, acceleration the breeding to marketing cycle) • The co-design of research with stakeholders, end users and civil society has been central in the UKRI Transforming UK Food Systems for Healthy People and a Healthy Environment Programme which has received positive feedback in terms of balancing quality of research with impact focushttps://www.foodsecurity.ac.uk/research/foodsystems-spf/ • It is also important to have more active engagement (monitoring/support) during projects and follow-up after completion to help with the dissemination of findings and deliver impact. This has been very successful in the UKRI-BBSRC supported Diet and Health Research Industry Club (DRINC) which was first established in 2008 to support pre-competitive research that investigates the link between diet and health. The research has enabled the food and drink industry to develop products that deliver enhanced health benefits for consumers. https://bbsrc.ukri.org/innovation/sharing-challenges/drinc/ Actions: • UN to encourage research projects and programmes to be co-created and co-designed by a range of academic disciplines and with a wide range of stakeholders and end users of research such as industry, farmers, consumers and policymakers to ensure greater outcomes, uptake and impact of the research Success: • co-designing research and training across disciplines and stakeholders will deliver coherent evidence to enable concerted action from policy, business and civil society. Read less Action Track(s): 1, 2, 3, 4 Keywords: Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Innovation, Policy
Independent Dialogue Nutrition: Bridging the gap between farm to fork for improved health and resilience in a changing environment Geographical focus: No borders Discussion topic outcome 6. Consumer behaviour • There is distinct gap between knowledge and practice – we know broadly what we should be eating, but how do we get there? The key challenge is how to use our knowledge to influence actual diet across diverse communities to achieve a win-win for human and planetary health. • the 'human' aspect of diets and eating go beyond nutrients. Not everyone is interested in or chooses foods based on health or the environment. They have other priorities of which the major is barrier is affordability of food as well as other influences such as pleasure, cultural and social aspe... Read morects which are more important and effect wellbeing. Decades of research have shown that education alone does not change diets and making information about healthy diets available to people is a very partial solution • Food environments are currently skewed towards promoting unhealthy food choices (advertising, pricing etc) and we need to make it easier for people to make healthy choices so this becomes the normal practice. However, this needs to be balanced as food is also an economic commodity so we need to factor in economics, livelihoods and inequality of access as a driver and impact factor. This could be addressed by integrating data methodologies including qualitative data, modelling and scenario development • We need to help people to better understand what they are eating and to develop interdisciplinary approaches, embedding social/behavioural science (e.g. marketing psychology), to enable this. Methodologies and technologies, such as objective feedback and coaching are crucial, but there is an urgent need to develop better, more objective dietary assessment methods to improve the self-reporting of diet. Currently it is very difficult to capture misreporting (under- and over-reporting of dietary/food intake) • We need robust evidence to make a real difference to diet and health and must develop clear metrics to derive a sustainability index that includes the nutritional quality of food at its center. There are lots of trade-offs to consider such as, food safety (allergenicity), cleanness of label, socio-economics and finding a way between these needs in an environmentally balanced way which is highly complex, particularly considering the different agricultural/food production methods including local production and self-sufficiency • Food technology: interventions at food processing, manufacture and distribution level is key to providing nutritious and affordable food for all. As increased food production alone does not always ensure affordability, regulatory interventions to make nutritious foods affordable are crucial. Actions: • Increased investment in food technology (food processing, manufacture and distribution level) is key to closing the gap in food affordability and providing a culturally acceptable and nutritious diet for all • Integration of data methodologies including qualitative data, modelling and scenario development relating food environments, economics, livelihoods and inequality of access to influence consumer behaviour/food choice • Integrating economic and social science in food systems research to help interventions take account of behaviour and equity of access Success: • A better integrated food systems research community with an appreciation of the importance of economic and social implications of transforming food production and nutritional quality of diets Read less Action Track(s): 1, 2, 4 Keywords: Data & Evidence, Innovation, Trade-offs
