Independent Dialogue
Geographical focus:
No borders
Main findings
In terms of priorities, the groups have identified AT3 (3.2), AT2, AT1. prioritize number 1. A lot of discussions on AT4. Land reform – access to land (farmers as beneficiary), access to capacity building, capital, fair market (especially women), direct funds to FOs not via LGU, representation of farmers/fishers in policy making bodies, reduction of control of market especially on prices. For policy/programme, the group proposed the following: Under AT 3, the institutional global environmental policy at each province, monitoring system, community involvement, education and campaign. It also
... Read moreproposed for the creation of monitoring team involving fisherfolks and farmers that will supervise and observe good agricultural practices per municipal/provincial level. Under AT 2, organic way of farming, information drive promoting local products/food safety, review trade policies on importation (rice tarrification) including food packaging. Under AT 4. strengthen micro entrepreneurs (talipapa) oversight committee. Under AT 5, the curator mentioned the active participation of multi-stakeholders in budgeting and monitoring disasters programs and environmental projects. In terms of actions to follow through, first is to continue this independent dialogue regularly with a system to follow-up post NID activities. Secondly, to look into the establishment of monitoring teams at the provincial level. There are also concrete suggestions from the group like the need to craft Magna Carta for Small Scale producers, extend food assistance for the babies and senior citizens during disasters and even the proper use of funds like the PCIC funds which should not be diverted to other uses (i.e., COVID operations) Read less
Action Track(s): 1, 2, 3, 4
Keywords: Environment and Climate, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy, Women & Youth Empowerment