Switzerland - Stage 3
Main findings
The GROUP DISCUSSIONS allowed for a constructive and fruitful exchange, in a pleasant atmosphere, and reached the following main results: (1) Participants called for the development and implementation of a HOLISTIC, CROSS-SECTORIAL FOOD STRATEGY, respectively POLICY, which would cover agriculture, nutrition, environment and public health, with QUANTITATIVE TARGETS. Its objectives should be defined at national level by the Confederation. Some participants suggested revising the Swiss Food Pyramid, to integrate in it the three dimensions of sustainability. Others expressed the need to develop a
... Read moreCOMMON UNDERSTANDING of what healthy and sustainable foods are. (2) In addition to policy measures, participants recommended to seize the momentum created by the preparations for the Food Systems Summit to establish a REGULAR DIALOGUE with a SYSTEMIC APPROACH at national level. In one group, the stakeholders discussed the creation of a “HOUSE OF FOOD – IMPACT HUB”, mainly as an independent body supporting existing local networks and ensuring their coordination, bringing together main actors and experts. Collaboration must take place with ALL STAKEHOLDERS ALONG THE VALUE CHAINS and with the WHOLE SOCIETY. Currently, the population seems not to know the Swiss agriculture well enough. (3) We should tackle the WEAKNESSES and IMBALANCES along our food value chains, such as the inequitable REPARTITION OF THE VALUE ADDED, unfair prices, and low income of farmers. Some participants were of the opinion that we need to change our paradigm, by considering the value/quality of food holistically, rather than seeking to maximise its output/quantity. Several responses exist, such as: increased TRANSPARENCY and the setting of the TRUE COST OF FOOD; income security for farmers through a guarantee or scheme to share risks; and a better recognition and remuneration of ecosystem services. (4) Participants identified AWARENESS RAISING and EDUCATION as primary means to transform of our food systems. In order for the consumers to take INFORMED DECISIONS, we need a system that collects, processes and publicises information, in a – again – TRANSPARENT and HOLISTIC manner. We should set up a clear, consistent and comprehensive LABELLING. In several groups, participants supported the introduction of a SUSTAINABILITY INDICATOR for BOTH DOMESTIC AND IMPORTED products, or even of a double system providing the PRICE TO BE PAID and the TRUE PRICE/COST OF FOOD INCLUDING EXTERNALITIES. MARKETING targeted at children should be limited. (5) In contrast to efforts building upon our individual responsibility, participants also discussed BANNING unsustainable items from our shelves. In other words, WE SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN THE CHOICE ANYMORE TO BUY UNSUSTAINABLE PRODUCTS. To accompany these measures, we would need an adequate social policy for households with reduced financial means. On a related note, criteria of sustainability should complement, or even replace, those of prices in PUBLIC and PRIVATE PROCUREMENTS. (6) RESEARCH, INNOVATION, DIGITALISATION and NEW TECHNOLOGIES were considered crucial to transform our food systems, provided that they are SITE-ADAPTED. Innovation must be understood broadly, including non-traditional knowledge generation. PREPAREDNESS activities, such as surveillance, should be better communicated to producers, bridging the gap between farmers and scientists. The legal framework should better support the application of new technologies, including through entrepreneurship, and help young farmers start farming. (7) Some of the current farming methods and practices must be reviewed if we want to MITIGATE our environmental impact – on climate, but also on biodiversity. Participants considered using feed additives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, applying a carbon tax, and renouncing to SOYBEAN meal from tropical regions in livestock feed. One major suggestion to ADAPT to climate change consisted in developing models to determine which elements of our food systems would be most affected. Some participants stated that local consumption and short supply chains should be favoured, in order to retain control over how food is produced. Finally, the AGRICULTURAL VOCATIONAL TRAINING should integrate the topics of climate change and sustainability. (8) In terms of FOOD WASTAGE, we must optimise our valorisation of BY-PRODUCTS and facilitate access to SURPLUSES, as well as improve the legislation on BEST-BEFORE DATES. We also need a legal basis to apply already existing technologies assessing EDIBILITY of food items. In addition, the stakeholders communicated a wide range of intentions during the break-out group discussions, related to several sectors along the food value chains. Read less
Action Track(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Keywords: Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Governance, Human rights, Innovation, Policy, Trade-offs, Women & Youth Empowerment