United States of America - Stage 1
Discussion topic outcome
A major overarching challenge identified by dialogue participants was inequalities and inequities in food systems. Participants raised the issue of underlying, long-standing inequalities in food systems and the effect of these inequalities on access to healthy diets, fair labor and business opportunities, and food systems’ resilience.Some participants discussed that inequities in access to healthy diets can manifest in food distribution and affordability. Some participants discussed that food access could be unequally distributed with some isolated groups such as tribal reservations havi
... Read moreng difficulty accessing fresh produce and other items. Similarly, in both urban and rural areas, some participants discussed access difficulties because of location of housing and proximity to the nearest grocery store, or lack of transportation. Some participants suggested that the financial ability to access foods for a healthful diet is part of the challenge.Some participants noted that structural and systemic racism and gender-based discrimination are drivers of inequality. Some participants noted that dimensions of inequality that can detract from equal participation in food systems include unequal access to capital and credit, land and land tenure, infrastructure (roads, transportation, digital broadband), and healthcare. Some participants noted that inequity can create barriers to entry for new food producers and farmers. Some participants mentioned that public programs based on welfare models can perpetuate inequality and should instead strive for beneficiaries’ empowerment.Some participants raised concerns about the tradeoff between efficiency and resilience, citing how the closing of large meat processing facilities during the pandemic caused supply chain shocks. Some participants hypothesized that market concentration had led to a lack of resilience in food systems. Some participants were concerned about who should bear the costs of providing well-paying food systems jobs, and the tradeoffs with food affordability. Another tradeoff some participants discussed was between access to fresh food and food waste. An example some participants raised was that while the provision of fresh produce by food banks or in food boxes may increase access to nutritious, food, it may also be associated with increased food waste.Some participants noted that evidence gaps related to the effect of inequalities on access to healthy diets include analysis of the costs and benefits of investing in diet-related health promotion and disease prevention versus treatment of diet-related health conditions. Some participants suggested that evidence gaps related to the effect of inequalities on fair labor and business opportunities included lack of information on economic mobility in the agriculture sector. Some participants recognized a lack of data on how models of investing in communities work, including land ownership.Some participants stressed the importance of funding for research on innovation that increases agility within food systems and addresses distributional challenges revealed by the pandemic (some participants defined agility as ability of agricultural production infrastructure to meet the needs of farmers of all sizes). Some participants hypothesized that creative solutions from the COVID crisis include shortened farm-to-consumer chains, the increased ability of food assistance participants to shop online, and pandemic food assistance benefits for families whose children were unable to access school meals. Read less
Action Track(s): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Keywords: Data & Evidence, Environment and Climate, Finance, Innovation, Policy, Trade-offs, Women & Youth Empowerment